Search Results

1. [2011] NZEmpC 43 Hally Labels Ltd v Powell [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...13 At [70]. 14 At [16] and [141] respectively. 15 At [68]. 16 [1909] AC 118. See also Rock Refrigeration Ltd v Jones [1997] 1 All ER 1 (EWCA). 17 See HG Beale (ed) Chitty on Contracts (30 th ed, Thomson Reuters, London, 2008) at 16-101 and Edwin Peel Treitel on the Law of Contract (12 th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2007) at 18-010. 18 [1999] 2 ERNZ 844 at 858-861. Billposting and particularly his comments about the special statutory context of employment law...

2. MOJ0047.03_factsheet_JUL23-Samoan_WEB.pdf [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...manager e te fesootai i ai i taimi uma seia faamae‘a lelei le sailiiliga, po o le ā lava le umi e faia ai. Lagolagosua o loo maua E saunia e le ACC fesoasoani tau tupe pe afai na maliu se tasi o lou aiga i se faalavelave. Telefoni vili fua: 0800 101 996. Upegatafailagi: acc.co.nz/im-injured/financial-support/financial- support-after-death E saunia e le After a Suicide lagolagosua e faafoe i luga o le initaneti e le Mental Health Foundation mo aiga ua aafia ona o se tasi na pule i le...

3. AJ v ZQ LCRO 134 / 2010 (7 February 2011) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...returned to the Respondent and VC, this will result in the account of 30 October being unpaid. For the sake of clarity, the Standards Committee order to cancel all fees charged by WM after the date of settlement will be confirmed. The costs order [101] The third order made by the Standards Committee was that the Applicant pay costs of $750 to the New Zealand Law Society pursuant to Section 156(1)(n) of the Act. The result of this review is, that the finding of unsatisfactory cond...

4. [2023] NZEmpC 217 MGK Homes Ltd v Yoon [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...Ltd, above n 1, at [84]. 12 Richora Group Ltd v Cheng [2018] NZEmpC 113, [2018] ERNZ 337 at [67]; and Waikato District Health Board v Archibald [2017] NZEmpC 132, [2017] ERNZ 791 at [62]. 13 GF v Comptroller of NZ Customs Service [2023] NZEmpC 101, [2023] ERNZ 409 at [162]. the $20,000 compensation. As this is a non-de novo hearing, I do not consider I am able to increase the amounts awarded.14 [72] In any case, the Authority did not err in either fact or law in awardi...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 014 Fleming v Waikato District Council [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...Identification of Submitters Appendix B: Spatial Identification of Submitters 233196 3447-9930-0392-V1 Appendix C Appellant’s properties Paul Jelaca Owners of 127 and 145 Old Taupiri Road Simon and Teresa Fleming Owners of 101 and 109 Old Taupiri Road (It is noted that 109 Old Taupiri Road is in the name of their business, Fleming Developments) 233196 3464-7708-7528-V1 Appendix D Non-Appellant landowners within the appeal area 165 Old Taupir...

6. INZ (Foley) v Niland [2019] NZIACDT 5 (5 February 2019) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 and any applicable regulations. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Section 53(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 8 Written Agreements 18. A licensed immigration adviser must ensure that: a. when they and the client decide to proceed, they provide the client with a written agreement b. before any written agreement is ac...

7. Kururangi - Wharekahika A47 (2006) 168 Gisborne MB 103 (168 GIS 103) [pdf, 419 KB]

   ...approximately 500 kilograms to the hectare (x 260 hectares) for 2 years and then maintenance topdressing after that to raise the fertility levels. (163 GIS 134) Mr Clissold's evidence was that it would Minute Book: 168 GIS 114 cost the lessee $101, 200.00 to rectifY the breaches of covenant. That amount is based on $91,000.00 for 2 applications of superphosphate and $10,200.00 for repairs to buildings. (163 GIS 135) In his evidence before this Court, Mr Clissold stated the...

8. BG & BG v Hakaoro [2013] NZIACDT 63 (19 September 2013) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...of the costs on the professional members as a whole the legislature had empowered the different bodies to impose orders for costs. They are nearly always substantial when the charges brought are successful and misconduct admitted, or found.” [101] However, under the Act the mechanism is less direct as the Authority and the Tribunal are statutory bodies. Members are levied through an obligation to pay licensing fees. There can be little doubt the purpose of section 51(1)(g) has the same...

9. Adair v ACC [2010] NZACA 5 [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...has the power to reinstate this appeal. [87] The Authority agrees that the distinction made by Mr Barnett in paragraph 14 of his submissions about the High Court Miller decision, ought not to be accepted. The provisions for reviews in ss.101 and 102 are almost identical to that for appeals in ss.107, 108 and 109. Thus the Authority agrees that the High Court decision in Miller should be followed as nothing rides on the difference between the review being withdrawn and an appe...

10. [2023] NZEnvC 088 Barr Family Trust v Wakatane District Council [pdf, 450 KB]

    ...provide noise mitigation, but also a visual screen for stock and event attendees. The Court directed that the [S] [6] [7] 4 applicant give further consideration to this and provide an appropriate condition. It is clear from paragraph [101] that the Court did not: … find the evidence to demonstrate that the events centre poses unacceptable noise levels and risk of effects on stock or farming operations … At paragraph [133] the Court made a further direction to addre...