Search Results

1. [2024] NZEnvC 079 Maungaharuru-Tangitū Trust v Hastings District Council [pdf, 19 MB]

   ...(formerly referred to as Site #68) Te Puku 5 Lot 3 DP 25317 Blk XIII Moeangiangi SD Toka / Rock and Lookout Tutira W100 (formerly referred to as Site #69) Taupunga 5 Sec 3 SO 465246, Sec 1 SO 10839 Kainga Tutira W101 (formerly referred to as Site #72) ORAKAI LAKE AND EDGES 5 Sec 3 SO 465244, Sec 1 SO 465244 Mahinga kai Tutira W102 (formerly referred to as Site #73) Waikopiro Lake & Edges 5 Sec 1 SO 465247, Sec 1 SO 3076, Sec...

2. Ngati Hine Forest Trust v Manihera - Ngati Hine H2B(2010) 12 Taitokerau MB 176 (12 TTK 176) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...Brown said he was. I adjourned the application to a two-day fixture on 15 and 16 July 2008 and directed the parties to file and serve affidavit evidence prior to that hearing. 4 123 Whangarei MB 90-101 5 125 Whangarei MB 207 12 Taitokerau MB 179 [12] On 27 June 20086 [13] A further teleconference was convened on 8 July 2008. I conducted a teleconference with counsel which resulted in an amendment to the timetabling orde...

3. Hemi – Te Pupuke E1G1A (2013) 60 Taitokerau MB 151 (60 TTK 151) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...licence is actually to increase the amount of the rates on the property. This is exactly the situation as it applies to general land. Some years ago, Council considered this issue and in particular took into account the provisions of Section 101(2)(e) of the Local Government Act 2002. This section requires every local authority to have a policy for the remission and postponement of rates on Māori freehold land. The 11 th Schedule to that Act sets out the matters that the Coun...

4. [2023] NZIACDT 8 - BC v Murthy (22 March 2023) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 7 [30] The Tribunal has received from the Registrar the statement of complaint (12 September 2022), with supporting documents. [31] The complainant responded on 25 October 2022 to Ms Murthy’s reply to the...

5. [2018] NZEnvC 096 Clevedon Protection Society 2017 Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 31 MB]

   ...(Consent Order version) IX. For the purpose of compliance with the conditions of consent, "the Council" refers to the Council's monitoring inspector unless otherwise specified. Please contact the Team Leader Southern Monitoring on 09 3010101 or monitoring@aucklandcouncil,govt.nz to identify your allocated officer. X. Final conditions -12 June 2018 (Consent Order version) Part 8 - Land Use Consent (Application LUC60291842) Hours of operation 20. Subject only to an...

6. Chalecki v ACC [2012] NZACA 16 [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...of the appellant’s claims presented by both parties. The Employee Contribution [28] Section 2 defines a “decision” as including any “determination, requirement, assessment, order, or direction made or given”; a review lies under s 101(1)(c) where the decision affects any granting, or payment of compensation under the 1982 Act. [29] Mr Forster made submissions on two levels. First, he provided calculations by way of submissions to demonstrate the way the appellant’s...

7. [2022] NZEnvC 069 Otago Regional Council [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...provisions agreed by the parties who attended mediation and an affidavit in support of Dolina Lily Lee, a senior analyst freshwater and land at the Regional Council.2 After a hearing on the papers, the court approved, pursuant to s149U(6) and cl10(1) to (3) of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991, an amended version of PC1 as set out in ‘Annexure 1: Plan Change 1 (Dust Suppressants) Provisions’ to that decision. [3] Since then, the landfills provisions (PC1, Chapt...

8. [2020] NZIACDT 41 - TBE v Proudman (30 September 2020) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...[2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Section 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 10 [50] The complainant sent an email to the Tribunal on 11 August 2019 stating that his daughter’s visa was declined two months prior to him being notified. The communications on multiple occasions were...

9. KBN v Wharekura [2019] NZIACDT 80 (9 December 2019) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 8 (2) Breaching cl 1 by providing dishonest and misleading updates to the complainant and falsifying emails from the Associate Minister’s office [40] As noted above, a statutory ground of complaint to the Tribu

10. [2020] NZIACDT 23 - Y(O)R v Tian (8 June 2020) [pdf, 135 KB]

    ...application, appeal, request or claim is futile, grossly unfounded, or has little or no hope of success, a licensed immigration adviser must: 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 9 a. advise the client in writing that, in the adviser’s opinion, the immigration matter is futile, grossly unfounded or has little or no hope of success, and b. if the client still wishes to make or lo...