Search Results

1. Practice Note applications under the protection of Personal and Property Rights Act [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...order or • a review of a personal order made on _______________ (Date) (Delete one that is inapplicable) For the person in respect of whom the application is made (“the person”) as follows: (Set out specific order(s) required – see s 10(1) of the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 (“the Act”)) 2 My relationship with the person is as follows: 3 I confirm the contents of my application. 4 I confirm that to the best...

2. LCRO 220/2020 UOY - Application for review of a prosecutorial decision (3 June 2021) [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...Moreover, as I have outlined above, the circumstances in which a Review Officer might interfere with a Committee’s decision to lay charges in the Disciplinary Tribunal are rare, and generally arise when the Committee has misfired in some way. [101] The matters raised before me by Mr UOY are, in my view, proper ones for the Tribunal to consider. They require careful assessment of all of the evidence, and matching that evidence against the legislative standards of misconduct, neglige...

3. [2021] NZEnvC 029 Darby Planning Ltd Partnership v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 884 KB]

   ...addressed herein, no order for costs will be made in relation to this decision. For the court: J J M Hassan Environment Judge ENV-2018-CHC-056 ENV-2018-CHC-082 ENV-2018-CHC-084 ENV-2018-CHC-092 ENV-2018-CHC-093 ENV-2018-CHC-098 ENV-2018-CHC-101 ENV-2018-CHC-106 ENV-2018-CHC-119 ENV-2018-CHC-124 ENV-2018-CHC-126 ENV-2018-CHC-127 ENV-2018-CHC-131 ENV-2018-CHC-13 7 ENV-2018-CHC-138 ENV-2018-CHC-146 6 SCHEDULE List of Appellants Upper Clutha Environmental Society...

4. Easy read: Have your say on the family justice system [pdf, 5.9 MB]

   ...writer counsellor something else. 100 How were you related to the child or children in the family dispute? parent guardian grandparent whānau / family Other 101 Is there anything else you would like to tell us? 102 How to have your say Thank you for taking the time to read and answer questions about the 2014 changes to the family justice system....

5. BT v OS LCRO 2/2013 (17 November 2014) [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...difficulties, OS should cover BT’s added costs of performing the fit-out agreement to OS’s satisfaction. [19] BT’s complaint to the New Zealand Law Society (NZLS) explained his dissatisfaction with OS’s conduct, and sought compensation of $4,101.92 to cover the losses he says he incurred in performing the agreement. 4 Standards Committee [20] The Standards Committee considered BT's complaint in the context of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Co...

6. Tito - Mangakahia 2B2 - No 2A1A [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 86 (2011 APPEAL 86) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...16 PRNZ 430 (HC). http://www.brookersonline.co.nz/databases/modus/caselaw/bcase/link?id=CASE%7eNZ%7eNAT%7eHC%7e2002%7e4546%7eHEADNOTE-PRNZ&si=57359&sid=ujrau71ljbno7bob4t4jarb4fsavmojv&hli=0&sp=bcase 2011 Maori Appellate Court MB 101 representing over 95 percent of the shares in the block, unanimously agreed that they did not wish the Māori Trustee to be sole Responsible Trustee of the trust and instead appointed 5 owner trustees. It is open to this Court to act up...

7. [2015] NZEmpC 84 Robinson v Pacific Seals New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...miscarriage of justice. That is said to be because the Court heard evidence from the applicant’s mother which was relevant to the quantum of 2 Robinson v Pacific Seals (NZ) Ltd [2013] NZERA Wellington 101. 3 Robinson v Pacific Seals New Zealand Ltd, above n 1, at [64]. compensation awarded and ought to have had regard to this evidence in determining the challenge. It is common ground that this evidence was not before the...

8. [2021] NZIACDT 10 - YC v Wan (19 May 2021) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...complainant. [48] No party has requested an oral hearing. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 9 ASSESSMENT [49] The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselve...

9. [2021] NZEmpC 93 Gestro v Relph [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...the sole trustee. [100] That LITC Ltd may have paid Ms Gestro wages is not, when compared with the range of other factors I have reviewed, sufficient to establish that this particular entity was in reality Ms Gestro’s employer. Result [101] A declaration is sought against Mr Relph personally. He says he acted as trustee of the Trust. That may be so, but that could not be an impediment to the grant of a declaration against Mr Relph personally. [102] It is well es...

10. Pickering v Reihana - Motatau 2 Section 21B2E (2021) 231 Taitokerau MB 103 (231 TTK 103) [pdf, 323 KB]

    ...Motatau 2 Section 21B2E I WAENGA I A Between LUCKY PICKERING CHADE REIHANA Ngā kaitono Applicants ME And EUGENE REIHANA Te Kaiurupare Respondent Nohoanga: Hearing 28 September 2019, 200 Taitokerau MB 96-101 18 December 2019, 207 Taitokerau MB 162-169 7 July 2020, 215 Taitokerau MB 13-18 14 December 2020, 224 Taitokerau MB 197-204 16 April 2021, (Heard at Kaikohe and Whangarei) Whakataunga: Judgment date 2 June 2021...