Search Results

1. Ratima v Ratima - Tahoraiti 2A 12A (2023) 105 Takitimu MB 29 (105 TKT 29) [pdf, 312 KB]

   ...OF THE WAIKARI RATIMA FAMILY TRUST Ngā kaitono Applicants ME And KINGI RATIMA, MILES RATIMA AND KIA RATIMA Ngā kaiurupare Respondents Nohoanga: Hearing 2 September 2020, 84 Tākitimu MB 236-246 3 November 2022, 101 Tākitimu MB 114-125 (Heard at Hastings) Kanohi kitea: Appearances Cara Bennett for Applicants Leo Watson for Respondents Whakataunga: Judgment date 22 September 2023 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ D H STONE...

2. Morgan v Public Service Commissioner [2022] NZHRRT 38 [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...Limited [2016] NZHRRT 38 (Singh) at [100]. Once a causal connection is established damages must be such as to adequately compensate the plaintiff for the behaviour to which he has been subjected rather than to punish the defendant; see Singh at [101]. Any award of damages imports a subjective element to its assessment. The circumstances of each aggrieved individual will be specific to them and unique: Hammond at [177.2]. [61] Ms Morgan said that she was distressed at the withdrawal of...

3. Family Court Rewrite Submission - Resolution Institute [pdf, 685 KB]

   ...1 Melissa Hanks, Perspectives on Mandatory Mediation, UNSW Law Journal Volume 35(3), 2012. 2 Australian Law Reform Commission, Review of the Family Law System Discussion Paper, October 2018, p.101 3 European Parliament Directorate General for Internal Policies, ‘Rebooting’ the Mediation Directive: Assessing the limited impacts of its implementation and proposing measures to increase the number of mediations in the EU’, 2014, p.7.

4. Pue v Tapatu - Okawa A1B (2011) 268 Aotea MB 93 (268 AOT 93) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...New Zealand courts have followed this general approach. For example see F Hammond Land Holdings Ltd v Elders Pasture Ltd (1989) 2 PRNZ 232 and Shivas v BTR Nylex Holding NZ Ltd [1997] 1 NZLR 318. 11 [2004] 2 NZLR 168 at 176 268 Aotea MB 101 [36] This case however is concerned with a permanent injunction. As a starting point for essential principles, although is a different context, in its judgment Eriwata v Trustees of Waitara SD s6 and 91 Land Trust - Waitara SD s6 and...

5. WQ v Emberson [2019] NZIACDT 28 (8 May 2019) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 9 e) maintain each client file for a period of no less than 7 years from closing the file, and make those records available for inspection on request by the Immigration Advisers Authority, and … [48] Prior to...

6. JM v AHX [2011] NZIACDT 2 (21 January 2011) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...assisting the Complainant in regard to the immigration matter being dealt with, and taking a lead role in the provision of that assistance. 4 [10] The minute notified the Adviser that the material could lead to the conclusion that: [10.1] The Adviser (as part of a joint enterprise with SN and DTM), failed to enter into an appropriate agreement relating to the provision of professional services, including dealing with issues relating to fees; [10.2] The Adviser was part of a...

7. Family Court rewrite submission: Save the Children [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...10 Doughty, J. (2010). Opening up the Family Courts-what happened to children’s rights? Contemporary Issues in Law 10 (1) 50-75. Retrieved from https://orca.cf.ac.uk/17058/1/doughty10.1.pdf 11 https://consultations.justice.govt.nz/policy/rewriting-family-justice-reforms/user_uploads/background- paper-overview-of-the-2014-family-justice-reforms.pdf 12 https://consultations.justice.govt.nz/policy/rewriting-family-justice-refo

8. Baker v Hemana - Tataraakina C (2020) 87 Takitimu MB 100 (87 TKT 100) [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...24 December 2020 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ MATUA ISAAC Judgment of Chief Judge W W Isaac Copies to: L Watson, Barrister and Solicitor, 342 Gloucester Street, Taradale, Napier 4112, leo@leowatson.co.nz 87 Tākitimu MB 101 Hei tīmatanga kōrero – Introduction [1] On 23 June 2020 Mr Nigel Baker applied to the Court for an injunction preventing any further damage and injury to Tataraakina C block and associated wāhi tapu sites located on the whenua...

9. Heng v Yap [2014] NZIACDT 110 (10 October 2014) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...appropriate standards of conduct are maintained in the occupation concerned. [10] When imposing sanctions those statutory purposes require consideration of at least four factors which may materially bear upon maintaining appropriate standards of conduct: [10.1] Protecting the public: Section 3 of the Act states “The purpose of this Act is to promote and protect the interests of consumers receiving immigration advice ...” http://www.justice.govt.nz/ 3 [10.2] Demanding mi...

10. [2021] NZIACDT 18 - CL v Khetarpal (10 August 2021) [pdf, 242 KB]

    ...Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Section 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 8 General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselves with due care and in a timely manner. Client Care 2. A licensed immigration advi...