Search Results

Search results for 101.

4522 items matching your search terms

  1. Hart v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 68 [pdf, 221 KB]

    ...respondent to be arguing against the fact of the appellant’s incapacity, rather that as recorded in the decision of Well NZ, that the incapacity is not the result of the covered injury of 31 October 2021. [100] Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. [101] Costs are reserved. CJ McGuire District Court Judge Solicitors: ACC and Employment Law, Ellerslie Izard Weston Lawyers, Wellington

  2. Tully v Yerman [2012] NZIACDT 19 (9 May 2012) [pdf, 102 KB]

    ...the complaint was that Ms Yerman failed to prepare and file the appeal in a timely manner, hence causing the deadline for filing an appeal to be missed. 3 [10] The material events in relation to the appeal not being lodged were: [10.1] 1 March 2010 On this date Immigration New Zealand wrote a letter addressed to Ms Tully. The letter said the application for residence had been declined, due to the child with autism not meeting the medical requirements. The letter gave...

  3. 2021-07-07 ORC - Closing Submissions [pdf, 422 KB]

    ...Otago Regional Council in relation to scope dated 7 April 2021 at [4]-[28]. 20 76 The Council considers that the amendments proposed in the planning JWS in relation to priorities are within the Court’s jurisdiction to make under clause 10(1) of Schedule 1 of the Act.41 Amendments “on” / “about” plan change 77 Deemed permits are a statutory fiction which expire on 1 October 2021. Given rights of priority extinguish with the deemed permits, rights of priority cann...

  4. IACDT - A Complainant's Guide to Proceedings [pdf, 439 KB]

    ...having been served. You are responsible for being able to produce acknowledgement emails as proof that your document was served. If another party is failing to acknowledge receipt, please inform the Tribunal immediately. 10. POSTAL SERVICE 10.1. You may serve documents on another party by posting them to the party at their place of residence or business in New Zealand. 10.1.1. If you are unsure, check with the Tribunal for the correct address. 10.2. The Tribunal will accept a tr...

  5. MOJ0504 Making a parenting plan workbook [pdf, 6.1 MB]

    ...91: Weekly plan - Name 92: Weekly plan - Name 93: Weekly plan - Name 94: Weekly plan - Name 95: Weekly plan - Name 96: Weekly plan - Name 97: Weekly plan - Name 98: Weekly plan - Name 99: Weekly plan - Name 100: Weekly plan - Name 101: Weekly plan - Name 102: Weekly plan - Name 103: Weekly plan - Name 104: Weekly plan - Name 105: Text Field 3: Text Field 4: Text Field 5: Text Field 6: Text Field 7: Text Field 8: Text Field 9: Text Field 10: Text Fie...

  6. AB v DE & Ors LCRO 75/2014 (11 July 2016) [pdf, 90 KB]

    ...(b) A requirement under ss 141 or 147; (c) An order made under s 156; and (d) A direction given pursuant to ss 142 or 143. 18 [100] The parameters of the LCRO’s power to review were considered in the decision of Lydd v Maryport.14 [101] For the most part, applications filed with the LCRO seek to review Standards Committee determinations, i.e. final and decided outcomes of a complaint. In that decision it was noted that “It is clear that not every step taken by a Stand...

  7. TI(G)M v Hanning [2020] NZIACDT 1 (9 January 2020) [pdf, 138 KB]

    ...5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 11 (2) Alternatively, failing to verify that the complainant’s employment history and employment agreement met the visa requirements before filing the application and failing to address Immigration New Zealand

  8. [2021] NZIACDT 22 – TC v Registrar of Immigration Advisers (3 September 2021) [pdf, 141 KB]

    ...complaint did not warrant a formal disciplinary process. OUTCOME [99] The appeal is rejected. ORDER FOR SUPPRESSION [100] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.2 [101] There is no public interest in knowing the name of the adviser against whom the complaint is made, nor would that be fair given the outcome of the appeal. [102] Nor is there any public interest in knowing the identity of the appellant...

  9. IACDT - An Adviser's Guide to Proceedings [pdf, 441 KB]

    ...having been served. You are responsible for being able to produce acknowledgement emails as proof that your document was served. If another party is failing to acknowledge receipt, please inform the Tribunal immediately. 10. POSTAL SERVICE 10.1. You may serve documents on another party by posting them in a letter addressed to the party at their place of residence or business in New Zealand. 10.1.1. If you are unsure, check with the Tribunal for the correct address. 10.2. The Tri...

  10. LCRO 18/2020 MP v LT (31 August 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...necessary and appropriate, but any attempt to draw conclusion either way is entirely speculative, and starkly illustrative of the difficulties in assessing a fee in these particular circumstances without having reference to the lawyer’s file. [101] The time records contain references to three instances of work done which is described as “review of current position”. This notation is vague and provides little explanation of what was actually done. [102] In fairness to the la...