Search Results

Search results for 101.

4522 items matching your search terms

  1. MG v Jean Xiujing Hu [2019] NZIACDT 20 (10 April 2019) [pdf, 152 KB]

    ...(4). 5 Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 6 Section 50 of the Act. 7 Section 51(1). 8 Section 53(1). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 11 1.5 Written agreements A licensed immigration adviser must ensure that: a) before any agreement is entered into, clients are made aware, in writing and in plain language, of the terms of the agreement and a...

  2. E43 Mitchell Tse - Auckland Transport - EIC - Council [pdf, 773 KB]

    ...monitor the scale of the activities occurring within the event area and where necessary additional measures will be undertaken to ensure the impacts to the transport network are minimised as much as possible. 1688 12 10 CONCLUSIONS 10.1 My evidence provides an overview of the additional processes that AT carries out to manage the road corridors due to construction activities from projects and events. These processes are additional to the mitigation measures required a...

  3. Kake - Estate of Aldyth Kake (2020) 209 Taitokerau MB 134 (209 TTK 134) [pdf, 294 KB]

    ...and advised that the bill had not been paid and so Carrie paid it on Aldyth’s behalf. It appears she did this because of their close relationship with Aldyth. [33] Mr Shanahan further argued that at the time the will was signed, Aldyth was 101 years old, Ihaia and his wife were caring for her, and they had a close relationship. Mr Shanahan argues this has common features with the case in Wellington. [34] In Wellington, it was not just the testator’s age that was of concern....

  4. ENV-2016-AKL-000272 J Mawson v Auckland Transport [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    ..."The Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel recommends that Auckland Council recommends to the requiring authority that it confirms the further modifications shown in Attachment 2 recommended in response to submissions on designation 101. II 5. Report entitled "Report to Auckland Council Hearing topic 074 Designations - Auckland Transport - Minor matters and errors, May 2016" That the following Panel recommendation at section 4 of the above report be ACCEPTED:...

  5. KXBK v GVH [2019] NZIACDT 74 (1 November 2019) [pdf, 195 KB]

    ...Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 8 Section 50. 9 Section 51(1). 10 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 11 Z, above n 10, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 11 [62] The adviser requests an oral hearing, but given the outcome the Tribunal does not require the appearance of any person.12 The complaint will be determined on the papers. ASSESSMENT [63] The Registr...

  6. [2007] NZEmpC CRC19/07 Abernethy v Dynea NZ Ltd [pdf, 79 KB]

    ...concluded before any higher court exercises its jurisdiction in relation to the investigations; 6 At p488 7 [1987] 1 NZLR 437, 440 [25] This may be compared with the objectives inherent in ss101(ab) and 143(b) and (c) that employment relationship problems, including personal grievances, should be resolved “quickly and successfully” and “promptly”. To have employment relationship problems resolved in the Authority on pre...

  7. [2024] NZSSAA 05 (23 April 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

    ...to be drawn clearly. 51. Ultimately, this involves interpreting the text of the enactment in light of its purpose in the usual way. 8 The statutory scheme and purpose 5 Social Security Regulations 2018, reg 133. 6 Legislation Act 2019, s 10(1). 7 Beneficiary AP v Chief Executive of Ministry of Social Development [2019] NZHC 2208 at [8]; Brosnahan v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [2013] NZHC 2618 at [32]; and McKeefry v Accident Compensation Corporation...

  8. [2010] NZEmpC 22 The Chief of Defence Force v Ross-Taylor [pdf, 55 KB]

    ...employee. The defendant’s services were essential to the proper running of the Navy Hospital and she did have some involvement in its administration, for medical purposes. She was 8 [1952] 1 TLR 101 (CA) 9 [1990] 3 NZLR 42 (CA) not, however, integral to the NZDF’s organisation of the Naval Hospital. This test also does not favour the defendant. Fundamental test [40] This test has been variously described as eith...

  9. Registrar of IAA v Ho [2019] NZIACDT 54 (31 July 2019) [pdf, 154 KB]

    ...[2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Section 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 8 [42] The Tribunal has received from the Registrar the statement of complaint, dated 6 December 2017, with supporting documents. [43] Ms Ho filed a statement of reply, dated 3 January 2018, with supporting...

  10. [2023] NZEmpC 94 Soapi v Pick Hawke’s Bay Inc [pdf, 255 KB]

    ...mentioned. [56] The answer to Issue 2 is no, it is not appropriate for an order for security for costs to be made. It follows that Issues 3 and 4 do not need to be addressed. 5 Highgate on Broadway Ltd v Devine [2012] NZHC 2288, [2013] NZAR 1017. 6 At [23](b). 7 At [23](b). [57] The application for security for costs is unsuccessful and it is dismissed. Applications to intervene [58] Two applications were made to intervene. The Human Rights Commission sought to...