Search Results

1. Matchitt v Butler - Matangareka 3B (2018) 189 Waiariki MB 74 (189 WAR 74) [pdf, 673 KB]

   ...the trust. This impression is clearly shared, because Stewart Butler is recorded as saying “that Tom had been talking like Kotahitanga is his business, Stewart would like it noted that Tom is not a shareholder or director of Kotahitanga”. [101] Later during a discussion about the percentage of KLHL that the trust was buying, Tom Butler said “the reason Kotahitanga is wanting to retain 55% of shares is so that Kotahitanga retains control of the company because at some point, us t...

2. INZ (Calder) v Shearer [2019] NZIACDT 41 (19 June 2019) [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...using a third party to discharge her personal obligations. 14 Section 50. 15 Section 51(1). 16 Section 53(1). 17 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 17 [85] It is not accepted that signing 20 applications in blank amounts to dishonest or misleading conduct. Ms Shearer’s conduct demonstrates a lack of professionalism in managing the process, by delegating...

3. [2019] NZEnvC 032 Tauranga City Council v Minister of Education [pdf, 917 KB]

   ...not requiring the identification of whether a project was such a development on a case by case basis, The Court also held that the choice of using development contributions as a funding source must be assessed against all the factors listed in s 101 (3) LGA02, including the distribution of benefits from Ihe infrastructure, and not simply on the basis of the causation of the need for such infrastructure," [84] For those reasons, the Court held that the Council had not complied w...

4. NZCVS-Cycle-5-Impact-of-COVID-Victim-experience-v2 [xlsx, 247 KB]

   ...robbery 47.10 5.75 * 44.91 14.36 # * 9.68 3.00 7.49 3.48 ‡ 18.81 4.89 * 11.13 4.41 ‡ * 17.68 5.60 * 11.23 5.16 ‡ 32.06 6.08 * 32.99 15.53 # * 3.68 2.08 4.25 2.97 ‡ 4.07 2.86 4.42 3.84 ‡ 12.29 3.33 * 11.22 4.53 ‡ Fraud and deception 3.88 2.04 * 1.89 1.65 * 2.47 1.95 * 0.67 0.60 * 1.14 1.20 * 0.56 0.53 * 2.61 1.76 * 1.43 1.62 * 1.01 0.64 * 0.47 0.50 * 0.46 0.52 * 0.51 0.56 * 0.80 0.60 0.42 0.56 2.72 2.15 * 0.87 0.69 * C...

5. Granting aid for Waitangi Tribunal matters policy [pdf, 851 KB]

   ...policy: a) Section 7(1)(f) provides for legal aid to be granted in Tribunal proceedings. b) Section 10 outlines when legal aid may be granted (e.g. relevant considerations include an assessment of prospects of success). Note, however, sections 10(1), (2) and (4)(a) do not apply to legal aid applications for Tribunal proceedings. c) Sections 11(3), 16(4), 18(7)(a) and 36(5) exempt Tribunal proceedings from the financial criteria relating to disposable income and capital and also from...

6. Research on the effectiveness of police practice in reducing residential burglary part 1 [pdf, 451 KB]

   ...security and victimisation 90 8.3 Security by burglary type 93 8.4 Security by household characteristics 94 8.5 Perception of household security 95 8.6 Why hasn’t more been done to protect homes? 97 8.7 Insurance 100 8.8 Summary of household security 101 9 Neighbourhood crime prevention 105 9.1 Neighbourhood Support 105 9.2 Policing 108 9.3 Awareness of Police and community burglary initiatives 111 9.4 Summary of neighbourhood crime prevention 113 Appendix A: Burglary Survey methodology 115...

7. [2006] NZEmpC AC 43/06 Axiom Rolle PRP Valuations Services Ltd v Kapadia [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...lockout. In that regard, s100 grants to the Court a similarly full and exclusive power in such proceedings to grant relief by way of injunction. [36] Part 9 (“Personal grievances, disputes and enforcement”) has its own object section, s101. Subsection (a) provides that Part 9 is “to recognise that, in resolving employment relationship problems, access to both information and mediation services is more important than adherence to rigid formal procedures”. [37] Part 10...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 111 Bracewell v Richmond Services Ltd [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...patient. As a former employee, Ms Bracewell no longer had such a relationship. I conclude she was not entitled to release confidential information to family members pursuant to cl 18.2, in the absence of written consent from the client to do so. [101] For completeness, I find that the provisions of r 11 of the HIPC could not apply in this situation. The exceptions justifying disclosure of health information under r 11(2) apply to a “health agency”. As a former employee Ms B...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 162 Birthing Centre Ltd v Matsas [pdf, 445 KB]

   ...issue in question may affect the nature and timing of the provision of information and consultation. Redundancy of particular positions presents different issues than does the formulation of business plans. 60 At [86]. 61 At [90]. 62 At [101]. 63 Auckland City Council v New Zealand Public Service Assoc Inc [2004] 2 NZLR 10 (CA) 64 At [24]. [65] It is to be noted that the subsection considered by the two Courts was subsequently amended. For ease of reference, I atta...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 87 Below v The Salvation Army New Zealand Trust [pdf, 259 KB]

    ...of the stated curriculum for the Dip SAMM was a four-day placement in a social centre, and a nine-day placement in a Corps living with an officer, observing and having the opportunity to participate in Salvation Army work in the community. [101] Information provided with regard to another qualification, The Salvation Army Certificate of Officer Training, made it clear that cadets would be involved in leading worship and would experience prison visitation or religious education in...