Search Results

1. Turangawaewae Trust Board v Takerei - Section 166 Suburb of Newcastle North (2013) 67 Waikato-Maniapoto 113 (67 WMN 113) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...three trustees, and the Trustees may 5 NZ Gazette No 85, 15 November 1928, p 3265. 6 17 Auckland MB 61 (17 AK 61). 7 NZ Gazette No 125, 12 October 1939, p 2677. 8 NZ Gazette No 41, 9 May 1940, p 1016. 67 Waikato Maniapoto MB 121 immediately apply to the Native Land Court for and recommend the appointment of one or two additional trustees and in case a vacancy occurs thereafter it shall be the duty of the Trustees to forthwith app...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 156 New Zealand Steel Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 830 KB]

   ...pollutants from the specified stacks must not exceed the following discharge limits (averaged across three representative samples taken in accordance with Condition 21 and emission concentrations (in mg/m³) corrected to ‘standard conditions’ of 0°C, 101.325 kPa, and a dry gas basis): Stack name Contaminant Discharge limit per stack Multi-Hearth Furnace (MHF) Stacks (4 stacks: IP1-IP4) Total Filterable Particulate Matter 75 mg/m³ and 5.2 kg/hr Nitrogen oxides (as Nitrogen d...

3. Justice Sector forecast 2011 to 2021 update quarter ending 2011 September [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...Population.......................................................................................................... 51 10. Legal Aid ........................................................................................................................ 53 10.1 Legal aid expenditure ............................................................................................................ 54 11. Explanatory notes .............................................................................

4. [2024] NZIACDT 17 – LB v Luv (23 May 2024) [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 6 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50. 7 Section 51(1). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 9 At [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 16 [59] In a Minute (1 December 2023), the Tribunal directed a hearing be held concerning the first and second heads of complaint only. From the Registrar [60] There is a statement of complaint (2 October 202...

5. LCRO 40/2021 PT v UT and RL t/a Law Firm A (28 April 2022) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...provided response to Mr PT. They submitted that: 4 (a) Mr PT had breached r 10.2 of the Rules,1 by contacting parties directly in circumstances where he was aware that those parties were represented by lawyers; and (b) in contravention of r 10.1, Mr PT had effectively defamed [LAW FIRM A] in the draft statement of claim; and (c) Mr PT’s attacks on Mr KB both in the draft statement of claim and in correspondence of 15 November were defamatory; and (d) Mr PT’s defence of...

6. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Schubach [2015] NZHRRT 4 [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...disputes which may arise from the retainers concluded by us on the 6th day of April 2009 and thereafter shall be Cologne (Germany). Therefore we hereby agree upon the exclusive jurisdiction of the Regional Court of Cologne Address: Luxemburger Str. 101, 50939 Köln, Germany, as the court of first instance. Dated at Christchurch this 8th day of November 2010 ..................................... ....................................... Client (Mr Schubach – Advoca...

7. LCRO 121/2017 PT v BD (25 July 2018) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...client “reasonable notice to enable [that] client to make alternative arrangements for representation”. [100] As well, once a retainer is terminated a lawyer must provide “reasonable assistance to [their] client to find another lawyer”. [101] In Ethics, Professional Responsibility and the Lawyer, the learned authors say:16 When the lawyer has a discretion to terminate the retainer, he or she must take into account the prejudice that will flow from the termination. Indeed,...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 181 Allied Investments Ltd v Guise [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...employment relationship between Allied and Ms Guise. Contract and Employment Agreement [18] The contract between Allied and CPIT, dated 1 August 2008, was produced in evidence. The relevant provisions, which are found in Appendix 2, provide: 10.1 The contractor must ensure that the Reputation and character of each respective Security Officer/Guard be beyond reproach, and that they possess the appropriate skills, training and licence to enable them to meet the CPIT staffing c...

9. Turner v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 36 [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...‘change made directly with Richard’. A letter to the claimants’ solicitor from Ms Tressider’s Page | 30 solicitor encloses a written response from Ms Tressider recording two discussions with ‘Richard’ about various items. [101] Also relied on is the invoice dated 18 January 2002 from Capstone to Ms Turner for the installation of bi-fold doors in an upstairs bedroom. The claimants had asked Mr Donaldson to make this alteration to the plans prior to the compl...

10. [2020] NZIACDT 46 - ZG v Parker (19 October 2020) [pdf, 357 KB]

    ...13 Section 50. 14 Section 51(1). 15 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 16 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 15, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 16 advice occurred without Mr Parker’s knowledge and despite his reasonable efforts to prevent it from happening. He did not structure his practice in such a way as to rely on unlicensed advisers. Nor was it