[2016] NZEmpC 54 H v A Ltd [pdf, 250 KB]
...which had previously been disclosed to Mr H’s lawyer, and which the company was now confirming it would rely on, is not precluded from consideration by cl 3.9.1 since it coincided with Mr H’s reinstatement as an employee of the company. [101] Turning to the next occasion when an adverse report was provided, Ms A signed an amended version of her statement on 4 December 2014. It was forwarded to Mr H on the same day, so that there was apparent compliance with cl 3.9.1. For Mr...