Search Results

1. [2011] NZEmpC 140 Gwilt v Briggs Stratton NZ Ltd [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...dismissal. In support of this claim, he produced a schedule of what he said he would have earned had he remained at BSNZ and what his actual earnings have been. As at the date of hearing, he said the difference amounted to more than $80,000. [101] At the time of his dismissal, Mr Gwilt was paid four weeks salary in lieu of notice. He then made numerous job applications before accepting alternative employment in Perth, Australia. It appears he began that job in June 2009. In the...

2. NG v Accident Compensation Corporation (Suspension of entitlements) [2024] NZACC 143 [pdf, 352 KB]

   NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF APPELLANT PROHIBITED BY S 160 (1), (2) AND (3) OF THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001. SEE https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2001/0049/latest/DLM101854.html IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 143 ACAR 31/2023 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN NG App

3. 20240930-Sentencing-Reform-Proactive-Release-2nd-Tranche_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 8.7 MB]

   ...through capping sentence discounts at 40%, by ethnic group and whether had Section 27 report Number Percent of total* Other Other Section 27 offenders Section 27 offenders Ethnic group report (all) (all) Total report (all) (all) Total Maori 101 59 160 62% 47% 55% -- Pasifika 19 9 28 12% 7% 10% - - -- European/Other 43 58 101 27% 46% 35% Unknown 3 3 7 Total 166 129 295 100% 100% 100% • Calcu lat ed as a percentage of those w ith known ethnicity Table 4 . Estimated annual inc...

4. Gangs-Legislation-Amendment-Bill-Escalating-Penalties_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...displaying insignia in public; and 9.3. introduce a bespoke search power. 10. In response to Police’s briefing, we provided you with an aide-memoire indicating Justice’s support for the status quo penalty framework in the Bill, noting that: 10.1. evidence indicates that increased penalties generally have a negligible deterrent effect on offenders (with few offenders understanding the penalty levels associated with the crimes they commit);1 and 10.2. repeat offending amounts to...

5. LCRO 35/2024 UX v RT (19 September 2024) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...respondent obtained a copy of Agreement A from the applicant, apparently on 13 March 2013. It was accompanied by a pre-contract disclosure statement under the Unit Titles Act 2010 dated 28 February 2013, which included the following representations:3 10.1 The common property is not currently, and has never been, the subject of a claim under the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 or any other civil proceedings relating to water penetration of the buildings in the unit titl...

6. Brightwell - Estate of Roera Rangi or Rangi Roera or Roera Te Heke-tanga [2019] Chief Judge's MB 1457 [pdf, 607 KB]

   ...117 – 118 (Ngarongo Kahau) 81. 130 Aotea MB 114 – 115 (Pera Karena) 82. 261 Aotea MB 154 -156 (Hare Karena) 83. 45 Wellington MB 272 (Taituha Karena) 84. 272 Aotea 116 – 118 (William Gordon Karena) 85. 6 Whanganui (Administration) MB 101 (Douglas Ian Carran) 86. 21 Auckland MB 87 (Douglas Ian Carran) 87. 3 Whanganui (Administration) MB 340 (Hereni Karena) 88. 5 Registrar’s (Whanganui) MB 213 – 214 (Hereni Karena) 89. 49 Tauranga MB 33 (Doris Ruby Robinson) 90. 174...

7. [2017] NZEnvC 175 NZ Building Projects Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 7.8 MB]

   ...which the application was made, or that the application was treated as being made under section 87B, is altered after the application was first lodged as a result of- (i) a proposed plan being notified; or (ii) a decision being made under clause 10(1) of Schedule 1; or (iii) otherwise. (1A) The application continues to be processed, considered, and decided as an application for the type of activity that it was for, or was treated as being for, at the time the application was firs...

8. 13.-Evidence-of-Mr-Phil-Peet-Transport.PDF [PDF, 1.3 MB]

   ...have significantly worse safety impacts downstream 9 Ōtaki to north of Levin: Vol 1: Consideration of Alternatives Multi Criteria Analysis Summary Report (Detailed Business Case Phase) – January 2023 (nzta.govt.nz). Refer page 35, 83, 91 – 101, for example. Page 16 and could result in high severity injuries (fatal and serious), compared to low severity (minor and non-injury) at the roundabout due to the speed of traffic. 85. The submitters also question why the new...

9. Director of Proceedings v Brooks (Application for Final Non-Publication Orders) [2019] NZHRRT 33 [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   ...of a permanent suppression order. There must be some material before the Tribunal to show specific adverse consequences which, combined with all the other circumstances of the case, justify an exception to the fundamental rule of open justice. [101] Just as delay might strengthen a case for suppression, it can also undermine the case. As in the case of Dr Brooks' wife. As pointed out by Ms Kelly, some of the communities in Taranaki have knowledge of the events and that Dr Brooks was...

10. Overview Trustee Ltd as trustee of the Carrigafoyle Trust v Cook & Anor as trustees of the CC Trust [2011] NZWHT Auckland 19 [pdf, 335 KB]

    ...been leaks. There were fewer leaks with Xypex. He could not find liquid which he would have found in a paint system. Cracking is inherent in block buildings but this one is well designed. There is always a problem in choosing a coating. [101] Mr Medricky drew a number of inferences to show that moisture enters through the wall from the exterior to the interior. He was critical of the quality of the block work and inferred that inadequacies exposed in the basement would be...