Search Results

1. NZCVS-Cycle-5-Impact-of-COVID-How-much-crime.xlsx [xlsx, 119 KB]

   ...sexual assault) 232 16.38 236 21.60 # 118 10.42 100 13.68 2.94 0.31 2.42 0.33 5.78 16.38 5.69 21.60 # Fraud and deception 314 8.33 393 10.08 247 6.60 327 9.41 6.16 0.41 7.90 0.74 ^ 7.81 8.33 9.48 10.08 ^ Cybercrime 112 16.17 101 20.55 # 89 12.70 87 17.20 2.22 0.28 2.09 0.36 2.78 16.17 2.43 20.55 # Sexual assault 178 16.60 234 42.14 # 79 12.96 81 17.66 1.98 0.26 1.97 0.35 4.43 16.60 5.65 42.14 # Harassment and threatening behaviour 271 16.7...

2. Family Court statistics in New Zealand in 2006 and 2007 [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...Table A3 Age distribution of New Zealand in 2006 97 Table A4 Applicants in parenting order applications (GU) in 2007, by age, gender and ethnicity 100 Table A5 Respondents in parenting order applications (GU) in 2007, by age, gender and ethnicity 101 Table A6 Age and Ethnicity breakdown of female applicants for protection orders (DV) in 2007 102 Table A7 Age and ethnicity breakdown of male respondents for protection orders (DV) in 2007 102 Family Court Statistics in New Zealan...

3. [2023] NZEnvC 186 Lund v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...site after the 2004 decision [38] The trust purchased the site at the end of 2005, aware of the 2004 decision. Mr Lund’s evidence referred to various passages in that decision and states that it 11 At [96]. 12 At [97]. 13 At [63]. 14 At [101]. 11 gave him confidence that a “more benign industrial use than the existing brick manufacturing” would be possible given the proximity of other non-residential uses, all of which had been referred to in the 2004 decision. [39...

4. NZCVS-Cycle-5-Impact-of-COVID-Victim-experience.xlsx [xlsx, 247 KB]

   ...robbery 47.10 5.75 * 44.91 14.36 # * 9.68 3.00 7.49 3.48 ‡ 18.81 4.89 * 11.13 4.41 ‡ * 17.68 5.60 * 11.23 5.16 ‡ 32.06 6.08 * 32.99 15.53 # * 3.68 2.08 4.25 2.97 ‡ 4.07 2.86 4.42 3.84 ‡ 12.29 3.33 * 11.22 4.53 ‡ Fraud and deception 3.88 2.04 * 1.89 1.65 * 2.47 1.95 * 0.67 0.60 * 1.14 1.20 * 0.56 0.53 * 2.61 1.76 * 1.43 1.62 * 1.01 0.64 * 0.47 0.50 * 0.46 0.52 * 0.51 0.56 * 0.80 0.60 0.42 0.56 2.72 2.15 * 0.87 0.69 * C...

5. [2024] NZSSAA 12 (5 September 2024) [pdf, 405 KB]

   ...received that money. The $127,740.45 relates to: [66.1] Excess main benefit payments of $909.81 calculated after the Ministry received income information from ACC; [66.2] Accommodation supplement of $46,984.38; [66.3] Disability allowance of $1,101.88; [66.4] Temporary additional support $76,018.46; [66.5] Winter energy payments of $2,513.76; and [66.6] Extra assistance to compensate for the effect of an increase in GST $212.16. [67] Each of these forms of assistance (exclud...

6. LCRO 86/2022 PR v KG and VW (12 November 2024) [pdf, 499 KB]

   ...into account all of the factors set out in r 9.1.21 [66] The Committee noted that the firm’s terms of engagement were ‘not particularly helpful’22 because of their generic nature. 16 At [97]. 17 At [99]. 18 At [100]. 19 At [101]. 20 At [105]. 21 The r 9.1 factors are set out in paragraph [121] of the Committee’s determination. 22 Standards Committee determination, above n 4, at [124]. 14 [67] The Committee “was satisfied that the parties had agr...

7. NZCVS 2024 Cycle 7 Sexual violence and family offences [xlsx, 83 KB]

   ...https://www.washingtongroup-disability.com/question-sets/wg-short-set-on-functioning-wg-ss/ 1 Sheet 1: Sexual assault offences Counts (+ 95% CI) 2018 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Pooled 000s 000s 000s 000s 000s 000s 000s Prevalence (Number of victims) 80 (62-98) 71 (55-87) 84 (66-101) 81 (55-107) 76 (56-96) 90 (70-110) 82 (74-91) Incidence (Number of offences) 167 (126-209) 169 (117-222) 200 (131-268) 290 (76-505) # 193 (136-2...

8. [2025] NZLCDT 18 National Standards Committee 2 v ZKA (24 March 2025) [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...“obvious” from tone and content that the emails were correspondence between friends. [100] The situation is clearly factually distinguishable from the present case where the events in question were work related in the manner described above. [101] We cannot see how conduct at a law firm social event, the attendance at which had connections with a partner’s remuneration and affected how he was viewed as functioning in his role; and at which junior members of staff felt they ou...

9. Doria v Diamond Laser Medispa Taupo Limited & Ors [2025] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...turn below. Damages for pecuniary loss [100] The Tribunal may award damages against a defendant for a breach of the HRA, in respect of pecuniary loss suffered as a result of the activity out of which the breach arose. Loss of wages [101] Ms Doria seeks damages for her loss of wages from the time she was put on early parental leave until the time that she considers she would have gone on parental leave (save for the discrimination), which was one week prior to her due date....

10. LCRO 61/2024 VO and EO v Law Firm A and Ors (16 April 2025) [pdf, 319 KB]

    ...been appointed or purportedly appointed, on the firm’s advice and the father’s instructions, to further the father’s interests as both the Principal Beneficiary and the Protector of the Trust. Their interests can only have been aligned. [101] [Company 3] then issued proceedings, the company filed a counterclaim, the issue of the potential need for the firm’s personnel to give evidence about the father’s alleged incapacity was raised by the company’s solicitor and the firm...