Search Results

1. People charged and convicted of offences related to family violence December 2020 [xlsx, 586 KB]

   ...order Imprisonment 531 582 573 661 813 922 959 885 840 836 29% 32% 32% 34% 36% 37% 38% 35% 34% 33% Breach of protection order Home detention 55 71 61 91 122 147 167 175 175 193 3% 4% 3% 5% 5% 6% 7% 7% 7% 8% Breach of protection order Community detention 99 101 97 131 145 146 166 199 205 254 5% 5% 5% 7% 6% 6% 7% 8% 8% 10% Breach of protection order Intensive supervision 103 89 84 99 141 171 170 227 293 318 6% 5% 5% 5% 6% 7% 7% 9% 12% 12% Breach of protection order Community work 466 478 451...

2. LCRO 163/2020 DM v TN and EX (9 April 2021) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...must be satisfactorily explained to the relevant decision maker. [100] There is no suggestion that during this time (the end of 20XX and October 20XX), Mr DM was himself responsible for the delay. Certainly, Mr TN has not made this claim. [101] As well, there is the delay between 1 April 20XX when Mr DM, through Mr TN’s receptionist, gave instructions to proceed with the personal grievance, and at the end of June 20XX when the file was handed over to Mr EX. [102] Mr TN had to...

3. LCRO 36/2021 ED v MR and FR (14 April 2022) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...[100] Mrs ED says that Mr MR knew the purchaser of Mrs DM’s property. Mr MR confirms that he did know the purchaser (Ms QQ) but he says that he only became aware that she was the purchaser after receiving the signed offer for the property. [101] Mrs ED seems to suggest that Mr MR acted against her interests by being involved with acceptance of the offer. The contract to sell the property was signed by Mrs DM herself. If she had not done so, the contract could have been signed b...

4. [2024] NZIACDT 15 – YT v CX (14 May 2024) [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...of these heads lead to the very serious allegation of a lack of 7 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act, s 50. 8 Section 51(1). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 10 At [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 8 probity. According to counsel, the Registrar does not point to any instance of dishonesty or misleading behaviour and this is because the evidence does not support it. [30] The Tribunal agrees with counsel. The...

5. [2006] NZEmpC CC 13/06 Angel & Anor v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...contributed to the situation which led to their personal grievances. In this case it is inarguable that they did contribute to this and to a considerable extent even if not deliberately so. This contribution will be reflected in the remedies. [101] Both men spoke of the effect of the dismissals on them. They were both dismissed just before Christmas. [102] Mr Angel’s wife also works at Clandeboye. They have placed plans for home alterations on hold and have had to rely on...

6. TU v Hakaoro [2013] NZIACDT 67 (8 October 2013) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...this Tribunal. [100] However, I do not find Mr Hakaoro solicited further fees at the meeting on 23 July 2011. In all other respects I accept what the complainant said regarding this meeting, as outlined in her complaint which is set out above. [101] I find Mr Hakaoro engaged in misleading and dishonest behaviour, due to his attempts at deception in relation to the fees and his obligations concerning them, which is a ground for complaint pursuant to section 44(2)(d) of the Act. [102] F...

7. Cree v Accident Compensation Corporation (Interest on Compensation) [2023] NZACC 195 [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...Cree’s earnings details for the period of incapacity and for the year prior to his incapacity. [18] On 9 November 2021, the Corporation made a decision on weekly compensation granting Mr Cree an entitlement to backdated weekly compensation of $110,101.53 (before tax) for the period 22 April 2016 to 18 July 2021. The Corporation calculated weekly compensation for this period, which was the period of incapacity determined by the Corporation. That was in part based on an ACC18 medi...

8. [2022] NZACC 30 – Estate of Su v ACC (3 March 2022) [pdf, 380 KB]

   ...family. [99] Sadly, Mr Su’s condition worsened and he passed away at 2.40 pm on 28 March 2019. [100] Following the treatment injury claim being lodged, Dr Meyer, specialist physician respiratory and general medicine, was asked to comment. [101] He was asked: In your opinion if Mr Su was an in-patient at the time of diagnosis, would this have changed the outcome in this case? [102] Dr Meyer’s response was: It is most unlikely that it would have changed the outcome...

9. Munro-Anderson & Ors as Trustees of the Munro-Anderson Trust v Reed [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...this case, the victory would be a hollow one, because there is no proof that damages have been caused by its negligence. 9.4 As a result of the above conclusions, I find that the claims against Joyce Group Ltd must fail. 10. COSTS 10.1 It is normal in adjudication proceedings under the WHRS02 Act that the parties will meet their own costs and expenses, whilst the WHRS meets the adjudicator’s fees and expenses. However, under s.43(1) of the WHRS02 Act, 792-973-Mun...

10. Rebecca Liv Stirnemann - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 699 KB]

    ...Tawharanui, Long Bay - Oku­ ra, Te Makutu (Waiheke Island), Te Whanganui-A-Hei (Cathedral Cove), Tuhua (Mayor Island), Te Paepae o Aotea (Volkner Rocks). Designation MPA Cable Zones Marine Reserve/ MPA Marine Park 9 Area (km2 ) 879 101.2 --21)00 , - - - , Ex:cluslve Economic t... - - . J Zone (EEZ) Relationship with IBA Protected area contained within site Protected area contained within site Left. Tracking of a female Fluttering Shear­ water from Burg...