Search Results

1. [2024] NZEnvC 026 Nelson City Council [pdf, 515 KB]

   ...consideration of the application for declarations. His submissions also noted the absence of any explanatory notes in the plan connecting the rule to symbols on the planning maps, for the purpose of identifying authorised launching ramps. 22 [101] As to the last of his points, it is not uncommon for plans to include explanatory information to the reader to assist in understanding how to apply chosen methods within a regional or district plan, including in relation to the sign...

2. [2021] NZEmpC 66 Smartlift Systems Ltd v Armstrong [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...humiliated and annoyed by the scores he had been given in the selection process, becoming bitter and angry about how he had been treated; and concerned about finances, in particular, the potential loss of his rental home due to his dismissal. [101] The Authority found that the humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings largely arose from the scores Smartlift gave them in the selection process, and the financial concerns they had over losing income. [102] In evaluating the...

3. [2022] NZEmpC 39 Malcolm v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 332 KB]

   ...no remedies had been pleaded, and that he would need to remove claims against persons who could not properly be brought before the Court as defendants since there was no qualifying employment relationship with them. 16 At [104]. 17 At [101]−[105]. [24] In the minute which I subsequently issued after the telephone directions conference, I drew Mr Bennett’s attention to those paragraphs of the Authority’s determination which raised issues that were likely to aga...

4. Whariki Haumaru Full Report [pdf, 805 KB]

   ...8 Gollwitzer, P. & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation Intentions and Goal Achievement: A Meta- Analysis of Effects and Processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 38 pp. 69-119. 38. 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1. 6 W H Ā R I K I H A U M A R U – P A R T N E R I N G W I T H M Ā O R I W A R D E N S T O R E D U C E W A R R A N T S T O A R R E S T Figure 1. The script used by Māori Wardens was informe

5. LCRO 143/2020 TJ v YY (16 December 2021) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...Committees, where the Committees not only invite the parties to provide submissions on the issues identified as being at the centre of the Committee’s inquiry, but also invite the parties to provide submissions on the issue of possible publication. [101] Mindful of the considerable delay that has occurred to date, and in a pragmatic attempt to ensure the most expeditious path to final outcome for both parties I propose to make directions that: (a) Notice is to be provided to the...

6. CAC 10026 v Dodd [2011] NZREADT 1 [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...AP130/96 6 September 1996 at 12. [99] In doing so the Tribunal has considered the past cases decided by the Licensing Board and referred to by Allan J. [100] The defendant‘s financial circumstances make the imposition of a fine inappropriate. [101] The Tribunal is satisfied that the defendant‘s conduct is a serious breach of s 73(a) particularly if one has regard to s256 of the Crimes Act and the maximum sentences contained therein. [102] The Tribunal is satisfied that the...

7. JR v SW LCRO 91/2014 (27 March 2015) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...[99] The first estimate to consider for this billing period is the estimate provided on 12 July 2011. [100] This estimate focused on the work to be completed in preparation for the judicial settlement conference set down for November 2011. [101] The estimate notes that costs incurred in the inspection and analysis of further discovery, would depend on the volume of documents received. [102] Mr SW submits that the significant increase of costs for this billing period (which he ack...

8. LCRO 208/2020 & LCRO 214/2020 JA v RR and RR v JA (8 October 2021) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...NZHC 2318 at [165]. 18 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Complaints Service and Standards Committees) Regulations 2008 (Complaints Service and Standards Committee Regulations), reg 32 — maximum amount of compensation. 17 Censure [101] The order made directing that Mr RR be censured was appropriate. Publication [102] Section 142(2) of the Act provides that a Committee may direct such publication of its decisions as it considers necessary or desirable in the public inte...

9. [2022] NZREADT 11 – BM & FM v REAA (2 June 2022) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2022] NZREADT 11 Reference No: READT 034/2021 IN THE MATTER OF An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN BM and MF Appellants AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 2101) First Respondent AND KN and TE Second Respondents Hearing on the papers Tribunal: D J Plunkett (Chair) N O’Connor (Member) F Mathieson (Member) Representation: Counsel for the appellants: K Burkhar...

10. [2024] NZLVT 011 - Hamilton-City Council v Shaw (15 April 2024) [pdf, 452 KB]

    ...(excluding the gully). [100] In comparing the analysed value of $166/m2 the report draws evidence from two comparable blocks sales, one at 71 Dixon Rd which analysed out to $145/m2 and one at 126 Horsham Downs Rd which analysed out to $250/m2. [101] In the first report, the ‘before’ value for Area B included land outside Lot 515 which is the title from which the designated land has been taken. That was readdressed in the addendum. The area is shown as Area G in that addendum....