Search Results

1. Brown v New Zealand Post Ltd (Recusal Application) [2016] NZHRRT 37 [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...was accordingly required to file any intended application by 28 October 2016 together with all supporting sworn evidence and submissions. The formal directions recorded in the Minute were: Directions [10] The following directions are made: [10.1] If in any of the three proceedings in which he is a plaintiff in this Tribunal, Mr Brown intends making an application based either in whole or in part on any of the documents filed by him on 26 August 2016, such application is to be filed...

2. LCRO 215/2018 WN v ZD (31 October 2019) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...disagreement as to what was said in the phone conversation of 30 May 2017, what is not contested is that the conversation was prompted by inquiry from Mr WN. Ms ZD appears to have given no priority to ensuring that Mr and Mrs WN were kept informed. [101] At the time Ms ZD represented Mr and Mrs WN, she was an associate of the firm. She was a senior lawyer. She had the primary responsibility for carriage of the file. It was her duty to promptly inform the clients that she was r...

3. [2017] NZEnvC 165 Yaldhurst Quarries Joint Action Group v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 5.2 MB]

   ...exposure to potential dust impacts. It was also said to "illustrate that strong winds on dry days mainly occur [locally] from the northeast, although they also occur for a small percentage of time from the south-southwest and northwest".19 [101] Mr Chilton predicts the percentage of time that six houses on Conservators and Savills Roads, in proximity to the subject site, "[are] expected to be" downwind of the proposed quarry during dry days and under relatively str...

4. [2018] NZEmpC 83 Kaikorai Service Centre Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 904 KB]

   ...(email from McPhail to Dobson / Parker with questions regarding issues arising in the bargaining) No 99 16-Dec-15 Email Neil McPhail – Bryan Dobson / Steve Parker (email from McPhail to Dobson with draft response to union organiser) Yes 101 15-Dec-15 Email Neil McPhail – Bryan Dobson (Dobson emails McPhail with information about an individual union member in response to matters raised by the union in collective bargaining. McPhail acknowledges) Yes 102 16-Dec-15 Email...

5. Hoban v Attorney-General [2022] NZHRRT 16 [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...Commission gave formal notice of its intention to appear and to be heard on the grounds the proceedings raised an important question of law. The Commission considered the Tribunal was likely to be assisted by its intervention for the following reasons: [10.1] The Commission’s complaints functions under HRA, Part 3 provide that it can respond to complaints of racial disharmony under both Part 2, s 61 and discrimination under Part 1A, s 20L. [10.2] The Commission has advocated for the...

6. Clarke v Overington - Maketu A Section 39 (2019) 215 Waiariki MB 95 (215 WAR 95) [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...the land, the appointment of trustees, and the conversion of the land to General land, was simply a device to obtain a mortgage to pay the rates arrears and other debts incurred by Robert Clarke. He says this did not include 215 Waiariki MB 101 any disposition of any part of the jointly owned land. Mr Dennett argued that applications filed at that time to transfer shares from the applicant to her sister and from Robert Clarke to his daughter were arranged by Robert Clarke�...

7. [2019] NZREADT 40 - Catley & Boyle - Ruling [pdf, 402 KB]

   ...Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act is very different from the procedure prescribed by the Real Estate Agents Act; in particular in that only the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal has jurisdiction to impose penalties (under s 101). Submissions for the Authority [32] Ms Mok submitted for the Authority that in s 111, the legislature proceeded on the assumption that a Complaints Assessment Committee’s determination of unsatisfactory conduct under s 89(2)(b) inclu...

8. IPT 2020-21 Annual Report [pdf, 520 KB]

   ...Appeals 30 June 2013 30 June 2014 30 June 2015 30 June 2016 30 June 2017 30 June 2018 30 June 2019 30 June 2020 30 June 2021 Tribunal Average (days) 247 228 208 201 175 175 274 353 194 Residence 240 134 173 116 60 101 76 98 32 Deportation (Non-resident) 228 230 184 127 90 89 121 141 76 Refugee and Protection 329 248 215 159 137 98 142 162 79 Deportation (Resident) 425 425 361 500 574 481 604 856 951 Comparative Graph Show...

9. Ratahi v CAC301 & Legge [2015] NZREADT 62 [pdf, 221 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZREADT 62 READT 101/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN CHRISTINE RATAHI Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 301) First respondent AND LYNNE AND GARY LEGGE Second respondents READT 103/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN LYNNE AND GARY LEGGE Appellants R...

10. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AC revised evidence chief Shumane final [pdf, 395 KB]

    ...potential difficulties in carrying out large scale upgrades in this area, but suggests that changes to management regimes may be considered as an option. This could mean further restrictions on general traffic to accommodate more buses and taxis. 101. I completed a scoping analysis of the road outside the ferry terminal and concluded that the restricted area can be extended eastwards by 80-90 metres to double the parking supply available to buses and taxis. Page 19 3155...