Search Results

1. Waata v Namana - Hurunuiorangi X3 (2023) 102 Tākitimu MB 263 (103 TKT 263) [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...2022. The trustees set out in some detail the steps leading up to the filing of the application and various exchanges trustees have had with the case manager, including those relating to the proposed mediation. The salient points arising are: 10.1. Trustees Waata, Nunn, Thompson and Rihi state that they unanimously agreed to opt out of mediation after following a very protracted process that provided ample opportunities to Mihi and Frances to resolve the issues. They say that onc...

2. [2020] NZIACDT 42 - NMS v Mercado (1 October 2020) [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...[2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 6 Section 50. 7 Section 51(1). 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 9 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 8, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 12 [59] A letter (26 November 2019) from Mr Z was produced in support. He and the complainant attended a meeting with Mr Mercado in November 2017. Mr Mercado assured him that the complainant could work 70/30...

3. AODT Operational Policy - DELETE [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...1.75 $465.50 98 4.75 TRUE 10:00 6.5 $732.55 $507.15 1.5 $ 151.80 $355.35 $ 507.15 $309.00 1.5 $441.00 98 4.50 TRUE 9:45 6.75 $760.73 $478.98 1.25 $ 126.50 $352.48 $ 478.98 $306.50 1.25 $416.50 98 4.25 TRUE 9:30 7 $788.90 $450.80 1 $ 101.20 $349.60 $ 450.80 $304.00 1 $392.00 98 4.00 TRUE 9:15 7.25 $817.08 $422.63 0.75 $ 75.90 $346.73 $ 422.63 $301.50 0.75 $367.50 98 3.75 TRUE 9:00 7.5 $845.25 $394.45 0.5 $ 50.60 $343.85 $ 394.45 $299.00 0.5 $343.00 98 3.50 TRUE...

4. NU v ZY LCRO 239/2012 (31 March 2016) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...obligation to inform the other attorney. Acceptance of that proposition could lead to the entirely untenable situation where two attorneys, entrusted with responsibility to manage a donor’s property, were acting entirely independent of each other. [101] Mr ZY’s response to this element of the complaint was not convincing. His couching of response in terms of argument that he had no duty to disclose presented as argument which presented at odds with the realities which would confron...

5. Harland v ACC [2010] NZACA 9 [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...with Mr McBride that the Court of Appeal addressed that precise issue (in the context of parents/family members assisting ACC claimants) and determined that health itself was insufficient; direct financial cost in doing so was also required. [101] Section 80(2)(b) of the 1982 Act provided: “80 Compensation for pecuniary loss not related to earnings b) Pay to any person, or to the administrator of the person, such compensation as the Corporation thinks fit for any identifiable...

6. P Singh v Kumar [2011] NZIACDT 24 (18 August 2011) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...[100] Clause 1 of the Code requires a licensed immigration adviser to perform services “with ... respect and professionalism.” The rude and abusive conduct lacked respect and professionalism, and thereby breached the requirements of Clause 1. [101] The conduct was calculated to lower the estimation of the Adviser’s profession in the eyes of the public. Clause 2.1 of the Code requires a licensed immigration adviser to: “f) uphold the integrity of New Zealand’s immigration system...

7. ENVC paper Guizhou Province Judges 2015 [pdf, 337 KB]

   ...management field, and whose Commissioners were professionals in their own fields like engineering, planning, ecology, economics and the like. Specialisation is important for good environmental regulation and for advancement of knowledge about it. [101] Also of importance for our system is having (hopefully) clear laws in legislation and in the national, regional and district planning instruments. The Court has also set up detailed rules about its procedures, published in its Practic...

8. UC v YW LCRO 165/2013 (30 November 2016) [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...to make findings of misconduct, but in exercising the jurisdiction available to it, this Office could return the matter to the Committee for further consideration, or direct that the matters be considered by the Disciplinary Tribunal. 19 [101] But having brought, as I am required to do, an independent and robust judgement to the matter before me, I do not consider that the conduct, considered in context, is of sufficient gravity to merit a referral to the Tribunal. [102] In ta...

9. Regulatory Impact Statement Hague Child Protection Convention [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...Island Affairs and Women’s Affairs; the Department of Internal Affairs, including the Office of Ethnic Affairs, the Department of Labour; Te Puni Kōkiri; Treasury; and NZ Police. The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet have been advised. 101. The Principal Family Court Judge, the Families Commission, the Office of the Children’s Commissioner, the Public Trust, the Family Law Section of the New Zealand Law Society and some family law academics have also been consulted. 10...

10. [2013] NZEmpC 145 AARTS v Barnardos NZ and Ors [pdf, 185 KB]

    ...costs neutrality applies to the plaintiff’s counterclaim. [65] The only issue on which I have obtained any real assistance from Mr Lee’s submissions, concerns Mr Aarts’s current financial circumstances. These are addressed at paragraphs 101-107 of Mr Lee’s submissions. Mr Lee says that Mr Aarts is engaged as a part-time contractual caregiver for brain injured people, working on average 22-26 hours per week at little more, or even less, than the minimum wage calculated ho...