Wellington Standards Committee 2 v O'Connor [2023] NZLCDT 18 (8 May 2023) [pdf, 177 KB]
...recorded, we are astonished that a lawyer, visiting a client in prison, would see it as acceptable to even note such a proposition. Mr O’Connor says he did not take any funds in reliance on 6 Submissions 26 April 2022, Bundle 61 at [4]. 7 Bundle 101. The file note also directed Mr O’Connor to pay, through Mr Coles’ online banking, a sum of $7560 to Public Trust (relating to his father’s estate) and to “Rose for dog care…”. 6 that note. Nonetheless, we find M...