Search Results

1. 2021-04-11 - Evidence Summary - Christina Bright 12 April 2021 [pdf, 307 KB]

   ...Schedule 10A.4 annual volume. WM ID Rohe Amended 10A.4 Monthly1 Expected 10A.4 Annual Abstraction2 Amended 10A.4 Annual3 Vol. difference4 Days less irrigation5 42 Dunstan 10,328 72,295 72,702 406 1 3 Manuherekia 157,416 1,101,912 1,109,188 7,276 1 21 Manuherekia 182,809 1,279,661 1,293,988 14,327 2 22 Manuherekia 38,886 272,205 278,248 6,043 3 30 Roxburgh 254,800 1,783,603 1,906,450 122,847 9 32 Roxburgh 158,240 1,107,679 1,169,946 62,268 9 37 Rox...

2. [2017] NZEmpC 139 Dean v The Chief Executive of the Ministry for Primary Industries [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...not to count as service: if an employee left before completing their full term of service they had to refund the value of days taken in anticipation, or work out the time owed.5 2 PSM: G100/G101. 3 PSM: G106. 4 PSM: G107. 5 PSM: G118, G120 and G100(3). e) It could be calculated to reflect part-time service, for example 25 years’ full-time, 10 years’ part-time.6 f) Allowances, including for penal or overtime, we...

3. LCRO 64/2018 IG v PC (1 August 2018) [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...“promptly disputed through proper professional channels”. [100] The Committee did not explicitly address that aspect of r 10.7, which operates as an exemption to the general rule that a solicitor must pay the legal fees of counsel instructed. [101] However, the Committee clearly turned its mind to that issue because it noted:19 [T]here is no record of any … complaint being received from [Mr E] although it was confirmed that [he had] requested, and was sent, a complaint form....

4. LCRO 144/2016 QT v UF (24 August 2018) [pdf, 245 KB]

   ...with the order that Mr QT rectify his error of requesting and receiving that money from Ms UF, and pay that money to her by way of reimbursement within 30 working days of the date of this decision: section 156(1)(h)(i). Anonymised publication [101] Pursuant to s206(4) this decision is to be made available to the public with the names and identifying details of the parties removed. 27 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers Conduct and...

5. LCRO 116/2019 RLF v DN (29 January 2020) [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...of the first will “without any new grant from the court”.30 Because “the office of executor of the first estate is transmitted to the executor of the executor[’s]” will, a “new probate of the original will is not required”.31 [101] It follows that on BG’s death, assuming probate of BG’s will was granted to JL, it seems that JL, as executor, would have become responsible for the distribution of Mrs LF’s personal property which would necessarily have involved iden...

6. LCRO 113-2017 GN v IG [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...have invested the maturing investments on-call pending delivery of the Court’s judgment. Neither the trust nor Mrs IG could 14 have taken reasonable objection to that course. The funds would have remained secure and earning interest. [101] Although a comment made with the benefit of hindsight, it is apparent that Mr GN recognises the dilemma I have referred to. At the hearing before Mr Hesketh he acknowledged that although he had no intention of depriving Mrs IG of money tha...

7. [2011] NZEmpC 29 Bunton v Garden City Helicopters Ltd [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...business on her own account because she worked solely for the plaintiff using the plaintiff’s equipment and lacked any real scope for increasing her income. 8 7 [2006] ERNZ 122. 8 At [101]. [57] Mr McPhail cited Downey v New Zealand Greyhound Racing Association Inc 9 where it was held that the plaintiff had experience as a self-employed person in business on his own account, knew the full nature of his engagement and ha...

8. INZ (Carley) v De'Ath [2018] NZIACDT 45 (13 November 2018) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...have been personally carried out by a licensed adviser, in breach of cl 3(c) 4 Section 51(1). 5 Section 53(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 11 (3) Failing to ensure that a written agreement was provided to all applicants once they decided to proceed and, in some instances where it was provided, failing to explain significant matters in the agreement...

9. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AC evidence chief Sam Shumane [pdf, 378 KB]

   ...road. 100. My observations show that at times buses and taxis park illegally in the restricted area, in particular during the busy holiday periods, and it is my view that future upgrades will most likely involve expanding the restricted area. 101. I completed a scoping analysis of the road outside the ferry terminal and concluded that the restricted area can be extended eastwards by 80-90 metres to double the parking supply available to buses and taxis. 102. Upgrades that include...

10. LCRO 195/2017 LH v SR and HP (19 March 2019) [pdf, 229 KB]

    ...LH. [99] As has been noted, Ms LH’s retainer was with Ms HP. [100] If Ms LH had prepared the will as she suggests she had done, was she obliged in the face of an apparent lack of follow up from Ms HP, to take steps to chase Ms HP along? [101] Clearly, Ms LH was required to advise Ms HP when the will was ready for signing. [102] There is no indication of her having taken steps to do so. [103] It could also be reasonably expected of Ms LH that she would, once the relationshi...