J v Khetarpal [2015] NZIACDT 95 (05 November 2015) [pdf, 224 KB]
...does not affect any relevant evidence Ms Khetarpal provided. Only four witnesses were present for cross-examination, and this decision turns on their evidence measured against the contemporaneous written record. [10] The four witnesses were: [10.1] The complainant; [10.2] The complainant’s prospective employer; [10.3] Ms Misa, the senior administrator in the practice where Ms Khetarpal worked; and [10.4] Ms Khetarpal. Discussion The standard of proof [11] The Tribunal deter...