Search Results

1. Jury v Korff - Rural Sec. 46 Blk. V Waitara East Sub. A (2023) 476 Aotea MB 28 (476 AOT 28 [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...IAN JACK JURY Te kaitono Applicant ME And CRAIG ALLAN KORFF Ngā kaiurupare Respondents Nohoanga: Hearing 16 August 2022, 453 Aotea MB 298-305 16 December 2022, 462 Aotea MB 77-84 18 August 2023, 473 Aotea MB 84-101 (Heard at New Plymouth) Kanohi kitea: Appearances Craig Allan Korff, Toumairangi Fowlie, Kris Marah, Patsy Crow, John Crow, Ian Jury, Wiki Machalanney Whakataunga: Judgment date 23 November 2023 TE WHAKATAUNGA...

2. Hoete v Faulkner Motiti North C No 1 Block (2017) 140 Waikato Maniapoto MB 1 (140 WMN 1) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...at [121]. 2 Joint memorandum of counsel dated 11 April 2017. 3 For an extended discussion see Nicholls v Nicholls – W T Nicholls Trust (2013) 55 Waikato Maniapoto MB 288 (55 WMN 288), Tukapua v Taueki – Horowhenua 11 (2012) 279 Aotea MB 101 (279 AOT 101) and Nicholls v Nicholls – Part Papaaroha 6B [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 515 (2013 APPEAL 515). 140 Waikato Maniapoto MB 3 [7] In considering a stay application the Māori Land Court and Māori Appellate Court ha...

3. LCRO 50/2017 TG v JT and TAP LIMITED (26 January 2018) [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...v Medical Practitioner’s Disciplinary Tribunal [66] Responding to Mr NP’s reliance upon B v Auckland District Law Society, Mr RB noted that the legislation then in force was the Law Practitioners Act 1982 (LPA). He observed that under s 101(3)(d) of the LPA a District Council or complaints committee investigating a complaint could require the production of documents “in the possession or under the control of the person complained against”. [67] Mr RB argued that the disci...

4. OIA-108973.pdf [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 Total name suppression Total 376 365 424 394 442 387 387 488 515 575 European 235 251 262 263 272 249 239 301 320 337 Maori 88 72 95 72 97 76 78 119 101 114 Pacific Peoples 25 16 26 32 29 18 24 31 32 41 Asian 25 10 22 16 29 18 28 28 35 33 Other 7 10 9 7 10 14 15 8 9 9 Unknown 7 18 19 16 17 17 16 18 27 52 Interim and fina l Total 91 107 90 96 119 101 109 128 144 128 European 55 8...

5. Dowsett v Paul A Crosswell Ltd [pdf, 25 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2007-101-000045 BETWEEN JOANNE MARY DOWSETT, NEIL RICHARD GRAY AND DAVID JOHN BOOTH AS TRUSTEES OF THE JOANNE DOWSETT FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND PAUL A CROSSWELL LIMITED First Respondent AND CAREYS JOINERY LIMITED Second Respondent AND BEVIN AND SLESSOR ARCHITECTS LIMITED (Removed) Third Respondent Hearing: 30 April 2008 Appearances: J M Dowsett and N R Gray, for the Claimant P A Crossw...

6. [2020] NZEmpC 238 Neil v New Zealand Nurses Organisation [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...discussed, considerations of justice and equity, as required under s 57(3)(d), operate to strengthen the argument against admissibility, having regard to the purpose and objectives of the Act.7 5 Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 143(b)–(c) and 101(a–ab). 6 Evidence Act 2006, s 57(2A). 7 Sections 101 and 3(a)(v)–(vi). [22] There are no extraordinary circumstances which point to this being one of the rare cases where disclosure of what was said at mediation would...

7. Carey Clan Trust v Still [pdf, 23 KB]

   SUMMARY Case: Carey & Anor v Still & Ors – Procedural Order No. 2 File No: TRI 2009-101-000022/ DBH 05711 Court: WHT Adjudicator: R Pitchforth Date of Decision: 3 August 2009 Background This Procedural Order deals with removal applications filed by: • the second respondent Mrs Susan Still • the third respondent Tauranga City Council (Council) • the fourth respondent CGAF Ltd t/a Bay Inspections • the fifth respondent The Building Advisory Bureau NZ...

8. Heta v Ministry of Social Development [2012] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 46 KB]

   ...and a date of hearing could be allocated. The points raised by the Ministry at the teleconference convened on 3 February 2012 [10] By memorandum dated 2 February 2012 Ms Harris for the Ministry asked that the following matters be addressed: [10.1] Whether the children should continue to be named as second plaintiffs. [10.2] Whether, given the removal of the second to fifth defendants, an amended statement of claim should be filed. [10.3] Whether Ms Heta intended to pursue her compl...

9. ID v QW LCRO 222 / 2010 (29 September 2011) [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...Practitioner’s wife had a short involvement with the matrimonial file at its conclusion. Procedural issue [11] Before embarking on a discussion it is relevant to note that the Committee ought to have made its determination pursuant to section 101 of the Law Practitioners Act 1982. By virtue of Sections 353 and 356 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act the Standards Committee was acting as a Complaints Committee under that Act, and obliged to consider the complaint as if the Law P...

10. BORA Legal Services Amendment Bill [pdf, 286 KB]

    ...for the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds of discrimination in the Human Rights Act 1993. Limitations on grant of legal aid for proceedings under the Immigration Act 1987 5. Clause 6 of the Bill contains a proposed amendment to s 10(1) of the Legal Services Act. That provision limits the circumstances in which legal aid may be granted for the purposes of proceedings under the Immigration Act 1987. The effect of the proposed amendment is to prevent legal aid being grant...