Search Results

1. De Wet v North Shore City Council [pdf, 323 KB]

   ...Inspections 92 Code Compliance Certificate 93 Inadequate Waterproofing to Parapet Tops 94 Window and Door Joinery Flashing Installation 96 Cladding Below Ground and Floor Level and Cladding Hard Down to Paved Decks 99 Internal Gutter Flashings 101 Glass Penetration to Flat Tops of Balustrades 103 17. Result – Council Liability 104 18. Liability: Ninth Respondent: E Lakay: Pre-purchase Inspection 106 19. Contribution 109 20. Costs 115 21. Result 116 2. Summary 2.1. The clai...

2. [2022] NZEnvC 082 Ormiston Workshops Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 571 KB]

   ...Detailed Site Investigation Soil & Rock Consultants 20762 22 Dec 2020 Site Management Plan Soil & Rock Consultants 20762 12 Jan 2021 Waste Management Plan Rubbish Direct 2 Dec 2020 Drawing Title Author Ref Dated Site Plan FORMiS A1101 Rev B 07/05/2021 Ground Floor Plan FORMiS A1301 Rev C 12/08/2021 Block Plans FORMiS A1351 Rev D 28/01/2021 Block Plans FORMiS A1353 Rev D 28/01/2021 Block Plans FORMiS A1354 Rev D 28/01/2021 Elevations FORMiS A2001 Rev C 15/12/...

3. November 2015 National Pānui [pdf, 326 KB]

   ...Whenua Trust - Variation of trust At Levin | Courtroom 2, Ministry of Justice, 9 Bristol Street, Levin Thursday 19 November 2015 | Judge M J Doogan Presiding Applications for Hearing PANUI NO: TIME: APPLICATION NO: SECTION: APPLICANT: SUBJECT: 101 10:00AM A20150004840 117/93 Pania MacDonald Samuel Lou MacDonald also known as Samuel Louis MacDonald or Samuel Lou McDonald or Samuel Louis McDonald - Succession 102 10:00AM A20150005446 117/93 Richard Hapareta Wharemate Albert Haparet...

4. LCRO 185/2017 DO v DP (18 March 2019) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...bank’s request for repayment of Mr JQ’s boat loan to his co-trustees for their authority to make that payment. [100] In particular, to Ms DC who would be disadvantaged if Mr JQ’s boat loan were to be treated as a liability of the trust. [101] The 27 November 2015 consent orders, which incorporated the consent memorandum did not include Mr JQ’s boat loan as a trust liability. [102] Ms DC applied to have the 27 November 2015 Judgment No 2 recalled. In his 11 August 2016 Jud...

5. Baker & Baker v CAC 416 & Drumm [2019] NZREADT 34 (12 August 2019) [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...APPLY”. Both of these photographs appear to have been provided by Mr Drumm, as part of his response to the complaint. There was no need for Mr Baker to supply a photograph of the billboard without conditions, as Mr Drumm had already done so. [101] The Committee also had evidence from Mr Drumm’s response to the complaint, in which he said that the billboard was altered to include reference to conditions: “Conditions apply” is stated on the golf club web site under the same...

6. Supplementary-Analysis-Report-Incitement-of-Hatred-Amending-the-Human-Rights-Act-1993-to-include-ground-of-religious-belief.pdf [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...Andrés Castaño-Pulgarín, Natalia Suárez-Betancur, Luz Magnolia Tilano Vega, Harvey Mauricio Herrera López. (2021) Internet, social media and online hate speech. Systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior: Volume 58.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101608. 24 D’Souza, T., Griffin, L., Shackleton, N., & Walt, D. (2018). Harming women with words: The failure of Australian law to prohibit gendered hate speech. The University of New South Wales Law Journal, 41(3), 939–97...

7. LCRO 1/2018 SY v LT and LN (17 December 2019) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...involved Mr SY in his role as the lawyer acting in the administration of the estate. That work was focussed on the legal question of how to manage the partial intestacy. It was, first and foremost, a purely legal question. Framework: conclusions [101] The above analysis, admittedly brief, compels me to the conclusion that I do not agree with the Committee’s view that Mr SY’s conduct is captured by rule 7.1. [102] Ms LT and LN were not, and never could be, Mr SY’s clients in...

8. [2024] NZEmpC 131 Boyd v OJI [pdf, 363 KB]

   ...challenge were or were not discussed with any of those legal representatives (and in any event, legal professional privilege may have applied to such discussions), there was plainly an obvious opportunity for legal advice to be given on the topic. [101] Given the evidence of the express references that were made to the right of challenge that existed, I am not persuaded that Mr Boyd was unaware of his rights, and I am not persuaded that he did not have the means to obtain informat...

9. L v EQC [2021] CEIT-2019-0036 [pdf, 411 KB]

   ...plus GST was spent on the supply of the glass when it was in fact $20-$30, and that the Expelair required replacement due to earthquake damage, when it was in fact undamaged. These are misrepresentations. 15 (XXXXXX: invoices 2011048 to 2011015, 2011107, and 2011108, below) and ( XXXXX : invoices 2011106, 2011126, and 2011153, below.) 2011047 – Broken glass in windows - $601.45 – 23/9/2011 [49] The invoice includes $360 plus GST for two panes of glass. The issues with who...

10. [2022] NZEnvC 029 Waimea Plains Landscape Preservation Society Inc v Gore District Council [pdf, 438 KB]

    ...[100] Returning to the evidence which had been available to the commissioners on the extent of visual effects, we observe that the assessments of Mr Pentecost and Mr Moore are more aligned with that of Ms Smetham than that of Ms Pflüger. [101] Mr Gray’s evidence referred to52 and agreed with the conclusion from Mr Pentecost’s evidence that the effects of the bridge will have significant effects on his property and the properties of his neighbours. 49 Y Pflüger, EIC, Appe...