Search Results

1. [2020] NZEnvC 205 Todd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 3.3 MB]

   ...decision in Man O'War Station Limiteci56 and the discussion on those and other cases, and related principles, in Upper Clutha Environmental Soc Inc. 57 For instance, identifying values is important for understanding 55 56 57 King Salmon at (101]. Man O'War Station Limited v Auckland City Council (2017] NZCA 24 at [86]. Upper Clutha Environmental Society Inc & Ors v Queenstown Lakes District Council (2019] NZEnvC 205, at (105]-(111]. I ' - -' ~ L...

2. Gilbert v Mulligan - Part 3 Lot DP 3020 and others (Shelly Bay) (2023) 466 Aotea MB 164 (466 AOT 164) [pdf, 487 KB]

   ...Te Komiti o Runga (2019) 221 Waiariki MB 200 (221 WAR 200). 42 At [52]. 466 Aotea MB 189 237 of the Act is not subject to Part 1 or s 19 of the Act; that s 237 is qualified as subject to Part 12 of the Act, but not Part 1 or s 19.43 [101] The Māori Appellate Court considered the relevant case law, the kaupapa of the Act, the scope and purpose of s 237 and how that relates to the express jurisdiction and powers set out in ss 18 and 19 of the Act.44 The concluding remarks o...

3. Directory of Official Information 2019 J-L [pdf, 834 KB]

   ...Gang Insignia in Government Premises Act 2013 6 Administered jointly with the Parliamentary Counsel Office. 7 Administered jointly with the Ministry of Health. 8 Administered jointly with the Department of Corrections. 9 Sections 100 and 101 are administered by the Department of Internal Affairs. 7 • Property (Relationships) Act 1976 • Property Law Act 2007 • Prostitution Reform Act 2003 • Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 • Public Trus...

4. Wall v Malone [2010] NZWHT Auckland 21 [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...negligence is available only when the claim is or may be based in negligence”. As the claim in tort against Mrs Malone fails I am not required to make a determination as to any contributory negligence by the claimants. CONCLUSION [101] The claim for breach of contract against the first respondent, Mrs Malone, succeeds. The claimants have the right to compensation for the loss of their bargain, the object being to financially restore the claimants to the position whi...

5. [2021] NZEmpC 205 WXN v Auckland International Airport Ltd [pdf, 455 KB]

   ...arriving or international transiting passengers on the landside of the affected airport. ... [100] A key issue arising is whether WXN is an “excluded airport person”, and thus not a member of the group described in pt 3.1 of sch 2. [101] Reference should also be made to the exceptions provided for in the Order. [102] Clause 9 provides that a chief executive – for present purposes, the chief executive of the relevant PCBU – may authorise affected persons not vaccinated...

6. Tan v New Zealand Police [2016] NZHRRT 32 [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...under the Privacy Act would inevitably be declined. Disclosure of Ms Tan’s connection to her brother along with the brother’s offending and convictions was needed or required in the circumstances and was not merely desirable or expedient. [101] The Police have therefore established that at the time of disclosure Mr Woodley genuinely held the requisite belief on reasonable grounds non-compliance with Principle 11 was necessary in terms of Principle 11(e)(i). [102] Ms Tan submitted...

7. MOJ0504-Making-parenting-arrangements-workbook-Tongan.pdf [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...91: Weekly plan - Name 92: Weekly plan - Name 93: Weekly plan - Name 94: Weekly plan - Name 95: Weekly plan - Name 96: Weekly plan - Name 97: Weekly plan - Name 98: Weekly plan - Name 99: Weekly plan - Name 100: Weekly plan - Name 101: Weekly plan - Name 102: Weekly plan - Name 103: Weekly plan - Name 104: Weekly plan - Name 105: Text Field 3: Text Field 4: Text Field 5: Text Field 6: Text Field 7: Text Field 8: Text Field 9: Text Field 10: Text Fie...

8. [2009] NZEmpC CC 5/09 Ramsay V Commissioner of Police [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...she went to talk to Detective Neill, the Sexual Harassment Contact Officer, on her own initiative and refuted the suggestion that she wanted to hide Inspector Gaskin’s and Sergeant Smith’s involvement in the sexual harassment complaint. [101] Inspector Gaskin said that she had rung him to tell him she wanted to proceed with a sexual harassment complaint. He then briefed Detective Neill to speak with her. Detective Neill also recorded that she met with Ms Hewitson as a resul...

9. Hutcheson v Clarkson - Mangamaire B No 2 Block (2020) 86 Takitimu MB 283 (86 TKT-283) [pdf, 379 KB]

   ...Whenua Māori Act 1993 for the numerous breaches of trust. [100] The former trustees, with their consent, are appointed advisory trustees and are directed to cooperate with the independent responsible trustee regarding access to trust records. [101] There are orders in terms of the application as set out in para [58] above to the extent that remains necessary for the completion of the trust’s accounts for the period under review. [102] Clinton Hemana is appointed sole interim respon...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 134 Booth v Big Kahuna Holdings Ltd [pdf, 197 KB]

    ...parties having agreed that the hearing of that challenge ought to be deferred until after the substantive challenge had been dealt with. Counsel are invited to confer and file a joint memorandum, if possible, in relation to the costs challenge. [101] Costs are reserved at the request of the parties. Christina Inglis Judge Judgment signed at 2 pm on 24 July 2014 17 Pursuant to cl 14 of Sch 3 to the Act....