Search Results

1. White v Potroz - Mohakatino Parininihi No 1c West 3A2 [2016] Māori Appellate Court MB 143 (2016 APPEAL 143) [pdf, 479 KB]

   ...land. 40 Haddon – Pakiri R (1994) 3 Taitokerau Appellate MB 178 (3 APWH 178) at [31]. 41 Re Puhi Mahi to Hutchison [1919] NZLR 82 (HC) at p 84. 2016 Maori Appellate Court MB 175 [101] Ms Hughes also sought to distance the present facts from the effect of the proviso in s 219(2) of the 1909 Act, which we set out once again: 219 Native Land Act 1909 … (2) On confirmation being so granted the instrument of alienat...

2. Huang v Leung [2010] NZWHT Auckland 16 [pdf, 284 KB]

   ...she was acting as a residential property developer for the dwelling in question. According to Ms Leung, this is particularly the case since she purchased the land and had the house designed and built for her to live in with her family. [101] Notwithstanding that information however, Ms Leung accepts that she did exercise a degree of control over construction and would owe the claimants a duty to exercise reasonable and care in carrying out her role in co-ordinating the vario...

3. Family Lay Advocate and Court Registry Handbook [pdf, 579 KB]

   ...is uplifted for a maximum of 5 days Application for place of safety warrant If there is high risk Options include 10 Judicial Conference in the Family Court Application is opposed Mediation (s170) Custody ss 101-109 Hearing (s150) Agreement/Plan is developed Order made Adjourned for filing of plans, report and identification of orders sought Application is unopposed Access ss 121-124 Guardianship ss 110-120 Restraining ss 87-90 Support...

4. CAC 10007 v Wallace [2012] NZREADT 34 [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...heard on the defendant’s application to be licensed; and briefs of evidence were provided; and under that “pathway” the defendant was “dealt with” in relation to the “conduct” which had been the subject matter of the complaint. [101] Mr Collecutt also submits that the REINZ subsequently received an appropriate explanation and determined that the complaint should not be taken any further. However, we do not know that. [102] We accept that both the REINZ and the Boar...

5. Wiezoreck v McHugh [2013] NZIACDT 35 (4 June 2013) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...nature of the “budget service” precluded her taking professional responsibility for the outcome. She said that after a client filed an application they may take steps without reference to her, and prejudice their case. Further documentation [101] Ms McHugh produced a copy of her file, and also statutory declarations from Mr Rupert Ward, the director of Oceania. Mr Ward discussed meeting with Mr Wiezoreck and Ms Mulder, and also spoke of what he considered to be Ms McHugh’s high...

6. Ashmore v Armstrong - Te Huruhi 12B (2021) 232 Waikato Maniapoto MB 219 (232 WMN 219) [pdf, 522 KB]

   ...landlocked? [100] The block is landlocked only if the accessway is not held in a fiduciary capacity by the persons currently registered on the separate accessway title. I therefore must first determine whether the accessway is held in that capacity. [101] Title to the accessway was transferred in 1995, when the adjoining land block was subdivided. At that time, the Trustees of the Trust were Ngaire Newton, Neil Rogers, Reremoana Ashmore, Isobel Heemi, Anthony T A Mataira and Gordo...

7. Director of Proceedings v IDEA Services Ltd [2022] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 690 KB]

   ...defendant’s requirements for reporting and responding to incidents and near misses, with an aim to make sure all such events are: responded to quickly and appropriately; reported; recorded; and that external authorities are notified where required. 101. With respect to responding to incidents and near misses, and reporting and recording incidents and near misses, the policy states: 1. RESPONDING TO INCIDENTS AND NEAR MISSES 1.1 Immediate Action to Take Following an Incident or...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 117 Hutchison v Nelson City Council re-issued [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...and reasonable employer could have done in all the circumstances at the time, since none of the serious misconduct conclusions were appropriate, and that there were significant procedural defects. The dismissal was unjustifiable. Remedies [101] In the fourth minute to the parties dated 17 December 2013, it was recorded that the remedies sought by Ms Hutchison are: a) Reimbursement of $25,000 lost income for the period from 13 December 2011 to June 2012. b) Compensation of $...

9. [2023] NZEnvC 156 The Bears Home Project Management Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 3.7 MB]

   ...REPORT 96 KAURI DIE-BACK MANAGEMENT 97 KAURI DIE-BACK MANAGEMENT PLAN 97 DURING CONSTRUCTION 98 DURING OPERATION 98 TRANSPORT 98 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN 98 AVOID DAMAGING ASSETS 99 ENGINEERING PLAN APPROVAL 99 CROSSINGS 101 Appendix A 670 Muriwai Road, Muriwai Valley 60 BUN60393755 3436-6066-5893, v. 1 TABLE DRAIN EASEMENTS 102 ROAD SAFETY AUDIT 102 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL 102 LANDSCAPE IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN 102 FINAL DETAILED LANDSCAPE...

10. Youth Justice Indicators Summary Report August 2019 [pdf, 1.5 MB]

    ...children aged 10 to 13 Percent by gender 14.0 3.7 15.5 29.1 14.5 8.8 14.4 Causing Injury Robbery, extortion Unlawful entry, burglary Theft Property damage Public disorder Other Male (72) Female (28)Male (72) Female (28) 500 225 165 45 101 32 208 93 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 R at e Māori Pasifika European/Other Total The offending rates youth justice indicator helps us understand the proportion of young people co...