Search Results

1. BORA Criminal Cases Review Commission Bill [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...the importance of the objective? Compelled expression – the provision of documents and evidence 10. One aspect of the Commission’s investigative powers involves the Commission being able to compel persons to provide information or evidence: 10.1 Clause 31(2) provides that the Commission “may obtain from any person … any information that the Commission considers relevant to an investigation”; 10.2 Clause 32 provides that the Commission may, by written notice, require a pers...

2. LCRO 114/2017 SM v JC (31 August 2017) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...response unopened. [17] In a reply filed by his employers, it was confirmed that Mr JC had advised Ms SM he could not talk to her because his client had instructed him not to, other than through her lawyer, before he terminated any call. Rule 10.1 of the Lawyers’ Conduct and Client Care Rules1 is said not to have been contravened, because Mr JC was not discourteous in his conduct towards Ms SM. 1 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (L...

3. Ashley v Bull [2011] NZWHT Wellington 25 [pdf, 67 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-101-000031 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 25 BETWEEN BRETT JORDAN ASHLEY AND LEEANNA TE KURA ASHLEY Claimants AND CATHERINE ANNE BULL (Removed) AND MAURICE CHARLES BULL First Respondents AND JIM NICHOLSON (Removed) Second Respondent AND IAN MURRAY SPROUSEN (Removed) Third Respondent AND BRUCE JAMES HUNTER (Removed) Fourth Respondent AND CHRIS JOHN LUSBY Fifth Respondent DECISION AS TO COSTS...

4. Moses-Heeney - Estate of Eric Moses (2018) 201 Waiariki MB 122 (201 WAR 122) [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...Karauti – Succession to George or Hori Kiwa Tukua (2000) 116 Otorohanga MB 81 (116 OT 81); Milner v Milner – Succession to Warihi Te Keu Faenza Milner (2008) 83 Ruatoria MB 108 (83 RUA 108); Bennett – Succession to Ronald Clifford Bennett (2014) 101 Waiariki MB 290 (101 WAR 290); Koia – Succession to Hoani Tau Takahi (2015) 133 Waiariki MB 273 (133 WAR 273) http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0004/latest/link.aspx?search=sw_096be8ed8170b93d_115_25_se&p=1&id=DL...

5. Cabinet Minute Strategic Approach to Support the Response to the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Historical Abuse [pdf, 298 KB]

   ...meaningful participation of those with disabilities, mental illness or both”; 9 noted that government is not currently perceived as always acting in accordance with the principles in its treatment of survivors; 10 agreed that agencies will need to: 10.1 take actions to actively demonstrate the government’s commitment to the principles; 10.2 consider the implications for existing government business (strategies, policies and ways of working); 11 agreed that, to ensure consistency...

6. GJ v TW LCRO 205 / 2011 (14 December 2011) [pdf, 80 KB]

   ...[1] This is a matter that involves two lawyers. Following a complaint made by Mr TW (the Respondent) the Standards Committee made findings of unsatisfactory conduct against Mr GJ (the Applicant), having determined that he had breached rules 10.1, 10.2 and 12 of the Rules of Conduct and Client Care. [2] Pursuant to Section 156 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the Committee ordered that the Applicant be censured, that he was to provide a written apology to the Responden...

7. Wai 3300 2.6.027 Memorandum directions of Chief Judge Dr C L Fox addressing matters concerning the wānanga ā-rohe phase [pdf, 497 KB]

   ...1341) claim (Wai 3300, #3.2.100). 8. The following parties filed after the 16 October 2024 deadline and have been granted leave to file late: (a) Darrell Naden on behalf of the parties listed at [1] – [1](m) of the memorandum (Wai 3300, #3.2.101). (b) Janet Mason on behalf of the parties listed in Annex A to the memorandum (Wai 3300, #3.2.102). (c) Ms Leauga and Messrs Hirschfield, Tupara, and Clatworthy on behalf of the Constitutional (Holloway and Campbell) (Wai 3254) claim (Wa...

8. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bill [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...recklessly fail to comply with a notice to supply information or data. We consider this power constitutes a search for the purpose of s 21 of the Bill of Rights Act. 1 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 10. Ordinarily, a provision found to limit a particular right or freedom may nevertheless be consistent with the Bill of Rights Act if it can be considered reasonably justified in t...

9. O'Connor v MacDee McLennan Construction Limited [2011] NZWHT Auckland 67 [pdf, 156 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-101-000030 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 67 BETWEEN KAREN & IAN O’CONNOR Claimants AND MACDEE MCLENNAN CONSTRUCTION LIMITED First Respondent AND DUNCAN MCLENNAN Second Respondent AND PORIRUA CITY COUNCIL Third Respondent AND G KNOL Fourth Respondent Hearing: 23 June 2011 Appearances: P Robertson for the claimant Reeves for the first and second respondent P Robertson for the third respondent G Knol...

10. SN v UQ Ltd [2024] NZDT 349 (29 April 2024) [pdf, 102 KB]

    ...1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 349 APPLICANT SN RESPONDENT UQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: A. The claim for a refund of invoice 4368 issued by UQ Ltd is dismissed. B. There is a Declaration under section 10(1)(b) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 that SN is not required to pay invoices 4369 and 4448 issued by UQ Ltd. Reasons 1. In about July 2023, SN sought advice from UQ Ltd about the trouble she was having with the transmission in her c...