Search Results

1. [2014] NZEmpC 61 McConnell v Mt Roskill Grammar School Board of Trustees consent [pdf, 12 KB]

   BARBARA MCCONNELL v MT ROSKILL GRAMMAR SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 61 [5 May 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY [2014] NZEmpC 61 ARC 101/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BARBARA MCCONNELL Plaintiff AND MT ROSKILL GRAMMAR SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES Defendant Hearing: 2 May 2014 Appearances: K Beck, counsel for plainti...

2. ABB Ltd v ZZC [2012] NZDT 31 (24 January 2012) [pdf, 57 KB]

   ...concedes that it did not obtain prior permission but claims that the relevant material was in the public domain. Issues [3] The main issue for the Tribunal is whether it has jurisdiction to hear the matter as founded in quasi-contract under s 10(1)(a) of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988 (“the Act”), notwithstanding the limitation of its jurisdiction in s 11(5)(c)(iv) of the Act. Law [4] The relevant parts of the sections referred to above are: 10 Jurisdiction of...

3. BB & AB v CC LCRO 134/2012 (26 August 2015) [pdf, 47 KB]

   ...the Committee’s function to resolve employment related disputes. In the circumstances the Employment Relations 1 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rr 10,10.1,10.3,10.3.1,10.7,11.1and 2.3. 2 Rules 10 and 10.1. 3 Rules 10.3,10.3.1 and 10.7. 3 Authority or civil courts provided Ms BB with an adequate alternate remedy that it would be reasonable for her to exercise. In the circumstances...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 145 Ngati Tuwharetoa Geothermal Assets Limited v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 521 KB]

   ...sets out the actions that remain to be taken by the Consent Holder; (c) provides an estimated time frame for completion of the actions that remain to be taken; and (d) reports on the results of sampling and monitoring data required by conditions 10.1a and 10.1B. 3.5 The Consent Holder shall not apply for a change of the conditions of this consent, or for a new consent, to authorise discharges from the East Bank Discharge Point after 1 May 2027. (Refer to Advice Note 7) Map Refere...

5. ADM Ltd v ZWN and ADN v ZWM [2011] NZDT 162 (14 January 2011) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...There is no reference to the hirer’s liability to third parties, I assume because the drafter presumed that to be a matter between the hirer and any such third party. [5] This basic position as to liability is then supplemented by clauses 10.1 and 10.5 regarding ADM Ltd’s damage waiver and excess policy respectively: 10.1. If the Hirer has paid the Damage Waiver the Owner will waive the Hirer’s liability (in terms of clause 7) for accidental damage ... 10.5. Excess: Al...

6. Te Pairi v Whakatane District Council - Tahora 2AD2 and Omuriwaka (2011) 33 Waiariki MB 48 (33 WAR 48) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...48) A2008003988 UNDER Section 19, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Tahora 2AD2 and Omuriwaka BETWEEN TE RAKE TE PAIRI Applicant AND WHAKATANE DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Hearing: 2 April 2008 (101 OPO 119) 8 April 2008 (101 OPO 207) 5 May 2008 (102 OPO 130-143) 31 July 2008 (9 CONF 140-148) 2 June 2009 (109 OPO 233-236) 2 October 2009 (111 OPO 179-192) 8 July 2010 (14 WAR 136-154) (Heard at Opotiki) Counsel: Mr Konin...

7. Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 71 KB]

   SUMMARY Case: Hearn & Ors v Parklane Investments Ltd & Ors – FINAL DETERMINATION File No: TRI 2008-101-000045/ DBH 05356 Court: WHT Adjudicator: R Pitchforth Date of Decision: 21 September 2009 Background In an Interim Determination dated 30 April 2009, the Tribunal held that the Wellington City Council, Mr Debney and Wadestown Developments Ltd (Wadestown) were jointly and severally liable to the claimants for the sum of $449,807. Those parties were invited to...

8. Application by attorney for directions - PPPR23 [pdf, 19 KB]

   r 406 Form PPPR 23 Application by attorney for directions Section 101, Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 In the Family Court FAM No: ……………… at ……………………………… [place] ……………………………………………………………………………………….. [full name] ……………………………………………�€...

9. ADF v ZWU Ltd [2013] NZDT 180 (19 June 2013) [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...there may be an argument that the damage was not suffered on 4 May 2007 but at some later point. In any event, the Tribunal’s jurisdiction in tort is limited to the destruction or loss of any property, or any damage or injury to any property (s 10(1)(c) of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988). As this appears to be a claim for financial loss, not related to physical damage or loss of property, I consider that the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in tort in respect of it. [6] I...

10. Form CS7: Notice of appeal against Commissioner's decision to refuse to accept an application formula assessment [pdf, 111 KB]

    r 259 Form CS 7 Notice of appeal against Commissioner's decision to refuse to accept application for formula assessment of child support Section 101, Child Support Act 1991 at ……………………………… [place] ……………………………………………………………………………………….. [full name] ……………………………………………………………………………………….. [addre...