GZ v TE LCRO 17 / 2011 (17 February 2012) [pdf, 155 KB]
...was as follows: “In such circumstances the Standards Committee is satisfied that Mr GZ had not met the standard expected of him by Rule 2.3 and as a result was in breach of the professional standards obligations to fellow practitioners in Rule 10.1 The Committee finds under section 152(2)(b) of the Act that Mr GZ’s conduct in this regard was unsatisfactory” This is a finding of unsatisfactory conduct as that term is defined in section 12(c) of the Act by reason of a breach of...