Search Results

1. D Ltd v B Ltd [2021] NZHC 1600 (24 June 2021) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...above, the claim for the additional amount under the head of a breach of warranty, is not successful. 20. As discussed during the hearing the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear a claim in tort where there has been damage to property under section 10(1) (c) Disputes Tribunal At 1988. However, B provided no evidence of any damage to property under their claim under the tort of conversion. For these reasons I find that the counterclaim is dismissed in its entirety. 21. For these reaso...

2. Fenton - Rurima (2005) 108 Whakatāne MB 148 (108 WHK 148) [pdf, 412 KB]

   ...Judgment: Introduction A20030005879 UNDER Sections 338(7) and 338(8), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rurima DAYLE EVELYN FENTON Applicant 19 May 2005, 106 Whakatane MB 178 30 .A.pril2004, 102 Whakatane MB 196 11 December 2003, 101 Whakatane NIB 256 23 December 2005 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY [1] The background to these proceedings is set out in my judgment of 30 April 2004, 102 Whakatane MB 196 and need not be repeated here. In summary, Kei Mer...

3. QC v-DH Ltd & DN & MS [2021] NZDT 1601 (24 June 2021) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...a quote for $552.00 to “rake and roll soil to make it compact and flat”. 2. The applicant is claiming that she was induced to enter the contract on a misrepresentation that the work would take four hours and is seeking a declaration under s10(1)(b) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 that she is not liable to the respondents in respect of the amount payable under the contract. 3. The respondents did not attend the hearing. The hearing was delayed allowing them time to appear. Th...

4. Chief Executive Expenses: 1 January 2011 to 30 June 2011 [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...South Wales Lunch (4 people) Wellington 3 March 2011 $773.00 Hosting Australasian National Justice Chief Executives Dinner (8 people) Wellington 15 March 2011 $56.74 Farewell for Commissioner of Police Lunch (5 people) Wellington 19 April 2011 $101.20 Welcome to new Commissioner of Police Lunch (5 people) Wellington 9 May 2011 $178.25 Meeting of new Police Executive with Ministry of Justice Executive Lunch (10 people) Wellington Total hospitality expenses for the 6- monthly peri...

5. Fulton v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs on appeal) [2023] NZACC 107 [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...conference (0.2): $254.00; 9.9.23 Appearance, Case conference (0.3): $381.00; 9.13 Preparation of bundle for hearing (0.125) $158.75; 24 Preparation of case on appeal (0.5): $635.00; 24A Preparation of written submissions (0.5): $635.00; 10.1 Preparation of affidavit (0.125): $158.75; 25 Appearance at hearing as principal counsel (0.5): $635.00; Total costs (2.45 days at $1270): $3,111.50 Less 50 percent: $1,555.75 [19] This Court notes that Ms Koloni...

6. E41 Ahad Khan - Development Engineering - EIC - Council [pdf, 696 KB]

   ...to the evidence of Nicola Broadbent). 9.2 I have reviewed the relevant parts of the draft CEMP, RAP and ESCP from a development engineering perspective, and generally agree with the proposed contents of those draft plans. 10. CONCLUSIONS 10.1 As set out in this evidence and my Report, I consider that any potential adverse effects of the proposal from a Development Engineering perspective will be less than minor, subject to implementation of the Proposed Conditions discussed in...

7. [2019] NZEmpC 94 Allen Chambers Limited v Pelabon [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...B A Corkill Judge Judgment signed at 3.00 pm on 6 August 2019 5 Allen Chambers Ltd v Pelabon, above n 1, at [20]-[22]. 6 Pelabon v Zumo Retail Nelson Ltd [2017] NZERA Wellington 101.

8. BORA Electoral Amendment Bill [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...evidential onus on the accused person, contrary to the presumption of innocence affirmed by s 25(c) of the Bill of Rights Act.3 10. The short point, however, is that the limitation under the Bill is justifiable on two well- recognised grounds: 10.1 The reporting obligations are not placed on the public at large but instead only upon those individuals who choose to accept responsibilities under the Electoral Act. Further, compliance with those responsibilities is of considerable importa...

9. Vikashwarjeet v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 6 (30 January 2014) [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...adviser’s instructions followed her inadequate advice regarding the prospects of a visa issuing and she did not lodge the application. 4 [10] If the potential factual findings were made out, the Tribunal could potentially determine: [10.1] The adviser failed to provide timely updates, or confirm in writing the details of material discussions (Clause 3 of the Code of Conduct). [10.2] The adviser failed to carry out her instructions to file applications for visitor visas a...

10. Dooley v Canterbury District Health Board (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 34 [pdf, 167 KB]

    ...to personal health information on numerous occasion during 2015. [9.2.3] Rule 9: Retention of health information. [9.2.4] Rule 10: Limits on use of health information.” [10] As to the first allegation the following particulars were sought: [10.1] Which “health Care Shared systems” were the subject of the allegation; [10.2] The dates on which Mr Dooley allegedly requested that he be removed from these systems; [10.3] An explanation of how the SCDHB’s conduct interfered with...