Search Results

1. Dooley v Canterbury District Health Board (Strike-Out Application) [2018] NZHRRT 34 [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...to personal health information on numerous occasion during 2015. [9.2.3] Rule 9: Retention of health information. [9.2.4] Rule 10: Limits on use of health information.” [10] As to the first allegation the following particulars were sought: [10.1] Which “health Care Shared systems” were the subject of the allegation; [10.2] The dates on which Mr Dooley allegedly requested that he be removed from these systems; [10.3] An explanation of how the SCDHB’s conduct interfered with...

2. EO v BD Ltd [2021] NZDT 1599 (30 July 2021) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...consumer by reference to a sample or demonstration model: (a) that the goods correspond with the sample or demonstration model in quality…” and (b) that the consumer will have a reasonable opportunity to compare the goods with the sample (section 10(1), CGA). I note that EO’s installer had already uplifted her existing floor before the planks were brought to her property. 9. I find that the vinyl planks supplied to EO by BD did not correspond with the sample in quality. EO brou...

3. OIA-109711.pdf [pdf, 922 KB]

   ...www.data.govt.nz/use-data/showcase/official-statistics/ Offence 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 Cruelty/Ill-Treatment Of Animals 59 62 66 59 68 Fail To Prevent/Mitigate Suffering 5 5 10 0 5 Miscellaneous Offences Animal Welfare Act 82 69 61 66 101 Miscellaneous Surgical Procedure Offences 2 0 1 3 0 Miscellaneous Transportation Offences 5 1 0 2 5 Total 153 137 138 130 179 This data counts convicted charges with an offence under the Animal Welfare Act 1999 and the Animal Welf...

4. Midlane v Woodberg [2013] NZIACDT 31 (27 May 2013) [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...consider that any lapse reaches the threshold for an adverse disciplinary finding. [100] Accordingly, this ground of complaint will be dismissed. The potential that Ms Woodberg was a party to an unlicensed person providing immigration advice. [101] Ms Woodberg has provided three responses to the potential finding she was a party to Mr Woodberg providing immigration advice unlawfully: [101.1] It is not possible for this Tribunal to make a finding, as such conduct would be a criminal o...

5. FG v PL & ML LCRO 176/2014 (28 November 2014) [pdf, 42 KB]

   ...contact details were unknown and the determination had to be brought to their attention by some other means than the common forms of service. 2 Lawyers and Conveyancers Amendment Bill 2010 (120-1), cl 10.1. 4 [15] It would present as illogical if the 30 working day period would not begin to run until five days after FG received the email, when it is clear that the determination was served on her by email on 29 May 2014. There...

6. Juan v Ramos [2016] NZIACDT 3 (14 January 2016) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...complying with the training requirement. [9.4] In all the circumstances, a financial penalty is an adequate response. http://www.justice.govt.nz/ 3 [10] A statement from Ms Ramos supported Mr Moses submissions. Significant points are: [10.1] Ms Ramos is a very well educated woman, with qualifications and experience in social work and journalism. Her education includes a diploma and bachelor and masters degrees in New Zealand universities. [10.2] She is successfully co...

7. [2022] NZEmpC 71 GF v Comptroller of the New Zealand Customs Service [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...of action - unjustified disadvantage and dismissal. The prayer for relief includes a claim for lost wages and compensation for non-pecuniary losses. [3] The plaintiff was adjudicated bankrupt by the High Court on 22 February 2019. Section 101 of the Insolvency Act 2006 deals with the status of a bankrupt’s property on adjudication. It provides that all property belonging to the bankrupt vests in the Official Assignee; the powers that the bankrupt could have exercised in, over...

8. HN v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 146 (16 June 2023) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...than seeking monetary damages, an applicant in the Tribunal can apply for a declaration of non-liability, that is, a declaration that the applicant is not liable to another person (the respondent) in respect of a claim or demand founded on contract (s10(1)(b) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988). If granted, a declaration of non-liability declares that the applicant is not required to pay the amount (s19(1)(d) of the Disputes Tribunal Act). Such a declaration will be granted once the claim i...

9. Tipene v Gray - Estate of Jack Tuakana Hurae Tipene (2007) 187 Napier MB 287 (187 NA 287) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...2C2X & others (aggregated) 50.84286 10 Nuhaka 2C2W2, 4, 61, 67, 67A, 211, 0.1 219-224, 226-231,233,235-245,248- 253 11 Nuhaka 2A4A11A 30 12 Nuhaka 2A4A3B3 0.025 13 Nuhaka 2A4A3B4 0.319 PANI POHATU TIPENE Incorporation 14 Poral,ganau 1010 Be 101A2B 7794 IMorporation 15 Mangaroapa 2B1 B 1068.995 16 Pukehou 2A 1724.751 17 Pukehou 2B 1462 18 Poukawa 11 D2 227.002 19 Poukawa 11 H Part 26.668 20 Okaihau 1 D2C 99.03 21 Waimarama 2F2 13.5 22 Poukawa 8 4138.334 23 P...

10. Infrastructure Funding and Financing Bill Advice [pdf, 94 KB]

    ...However, the Supreme Court has held that an unreasonable search logically cannot be reasonably justified and therefore the inquiry does not need to be undertaken.4 3 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 4 Above, n1 at [162]. Rather, the assessment to be undertaken is first, whether what occurs is a search or seizure, and, if so, whether that search or seizure was reasonable. In asses...