4512 items matching your search terms
...Mr Fulton’s rights, a copy of this judgment will also be sent to Mr Fulton himself. [26] There are no issues as to costs. P R Spiller District Court Judge 3 See Stewart v Accident Compensation Corporation [2022] NZACC 101.
...Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 6 ASSESSMENT [29] The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: Refunds 24 A licensed immigration adviser must: … b) ensure that refund obligations can be met, and c) promptly provide an...
...breakwater structures running on a north south axis. The amended design proposes the primary breakwater as a convex shape and the secondary breakwater complements the primary and links toward the shoreline by adopting a concave shape. (Refer Figure 101 for a cross section of the breakwaters). 12. The breakwaters are now to be constructed with rocks that are less uniform in size, with larger rocks used to provide some differential form to the top level of the breakwaters in par...
...the Trust is teetering on a financial crisis and, with only one of five trustees acting, is dysfunctional. The Court has a duty to intervene in those circumstances. A review of the trust is clearly urgently required. That 28 Taitokerau MB 101 cannot be concluded today. I will therefore be adjourning the applications to a hearing on 2 November 2011. I will require the current trustees to attend Court together with the Trust’s accountant. And I will also be directing that no...
...and did not meet the requirements spelt out in reg 20 of the Employment Court Regulations 2000 (the regulations). 1 Bay of Plenty District Health Board v CultureSafe New Zealand Ltd [2019] NZERA 101. [9] I have also received and considered submissions filed for each party. Overview of the parties’ cases [10] In support of the defendants’ application for leave, Ms Weatherly-Hull, an employee of the first defendant Cu...
...Tribunal’s jurisdiction and must be struck out. [10] Mr Willing’s complaint made in 2012 resulted in a Privacy Commissioner investigation. The Certificate of Investigation issued on 31 March 2015 stated the matters investigated were: [10.1] The delay of almost twelve months by the Police in responding to Mr Willing’s Privacy Act request dated 10 November 2011 under IPP 6; and [10.2] The collection of information by the Police from individuals not named by Mr Willing as re...
...contribution for the fencing costs. 2. The issues to be resolved are as follows: a) Is SS liable for a contribution to the fence costs? b) If so, is Mr KD entitled to claim $945.59? Is SS liable for a contribution to the fence costs? 3. Section 10(1) – (2) of the Fencing Act 1978 (FA) states that anyone who desires to compel any other occupier to contribute to the cost of a fence shall serve on him/her a notice. That notice should include details such as the boundary or l...
...UN’s hibiscus tree roots encroached on her land and caused damage to her garden. She states she attempted to fix the problem and had concreting installed in the garden to stop the root encroachment. She claims for the concreting. 12. Section 10(1)(c) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 allows the Tribunal to hear a claim in tort in respect of the destruction or loss of any property and any damage or injury to any property. LQ is claiming for the laying of concrete to prevent and/or min...
...citizens.6 In the present 4 Section 38 of the Statistics Act 1975 provides that information provided may not be admissible in any proceedings, except for prosecutions for failing to make disclosures under the Act itself. 5 Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161], per Blanchard J. 6 Butler & Butler The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act: A Commentary (LexisNexis New Zealand Limited, Wellington, 2015, 2nd ed) at [18.8.1], in particular, citing the comments made by Tipp...
...Commission [2016] NZCA 517, [2016] 23 PRNZ 765 at [12], confirmed in Taranaki Galvanisers Ltd v Udderfield Ltd [2018] NZCA 297 at [16]. 5 Oliver v Star Moving Ltd [2016] NZERA Christchurch 70; Oliver v Star Moving Ltd (No 2) [2016] NZERA Christchurch 101; Oliver v Scott Haulage 2010 Ltd [2016] NZERA Christchurch 141; Oliver v Scott Haulage 2010 Ltd [2018] NZERA Christchurch 183; and Oliver v Scott Haulage 2010 Ltd [2019] NZERA 36. [8] At the first telephone directions conf...