Search Results

1. [2009] NZEmpC AC 47/09 Hyro Services Pty Ltd v Speed [pdf, 30 KB]

   ...The plaintiff sought to distinguish this case from those in which the challenger’s behaviour amounted to intentional obstruction or other destructive/inappropriate behaviour. The plaintiff relied on Taylor v Von Tunzelman [2008] ERNZ 101 for the proposition that for the Court to limit the nature and extent of the hearing of a challenge following a good faith report, the failures must have been deliberate in the sense of being more than the consequence of simple inadverten...

2. [2024] NZEmpC 171 Lanigan v Fonterra Brands (New Zealand) Ltd (Interlocutory (No 3) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...NZLR 239 at [19], [22], and [111] per Glazebrook J. 4 See at [212]; and Takamore v Clark [2012] NZSC 116, [2013] 2 NZLR 733 at [150]. 5 This situation is materially different to GF v Comptroller of the New Zealand Customs Service [2023] NZEmpC 101, [2023] ERNZ 409, where the employer had incorporated a Te Ao Māori perspective throughout its documentation. See also Ellis v R, above n 3, at [125] per Glazebrook J and [273] per Williams J. consider the relevance of tikang...

3. Family-Court-Associates_Family-Court-Amendment-Rules-2024_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 273 KB]

   ...Family Court Associates will be able to make these orders and directions at any stage of a proceeding before the hearing of the substantive application. 10 Family Court Associates will exercise powers in relation to a range of tasks including: 10.1 procedural judicial tasks; these are orders and directions made in straightforward cases, or orders and directions usually made by Registrars that have been referred up due to complexity; and 10.2 matters requiring a greater level of enga...

4. Martin v Accident Compensation Corporation (Weekly Compensation) [2023] NZACC 67 [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...applicable to the former. If that were not the case, the appellant’s Australian employer would be an “employer” for the purposes of the ARCI Act. That would then lead to the Australian employer being liable to pay employee premiums under s 101 of the Act. That such is plainly not the case, nor intended to be, reinforces the view that it is only income or earnings which are subject to New Zealand income tax law which can be considered as determining entitlement to weekly compe...

5. E44 Richard Simonds - Groundwater - EIC - Council [pdf, 753 KB]

   ...attached to the planning evidence of Nicola Broadbent for the Council. 9.5 As noted above, I consider that the contingency and mitigation measures described in the updated GWMCP attached to Mr Grant’s evidence are appropriate. 10. CONCLUSIONS 10.1 The Applicant has undertaken an appropriate scope of on-site geotechnical investigations and provided appropriate and suitably conservative geotechnical and groundwater level data and on the basis of this data has undertaken an adequa...

6. EU v G Ltd [2024] NZDT 181 (13 June 2024) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...the respondent’s vehicle by other drivers. Further the respondent claims the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence of damage to his vehicle or that his vehicle was rendered undrivable by the tar and chip on his tyres. [7] Under section 10(1)(c) of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988 the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear claim in tort resulting in the destruction or loss of property, or damage or injury to property, or the recovery of property. [8] For a negligence action to suc...

7. MOJ0047.03 When someone dies suddenly factsheet [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...detail. The case manager will be available as an ongoing contact until the inquiry is complete, however long that process takes. Support available ACC provides financial support if a family or whānau member has died from an accident. Freephone: 0800 101 996. Website: acc. co.nz/im-injured/financial-support/financial-support-after-death After a Suicide provides an online support service run by the Mental Health Foundation for families and whānau affected by suicide. Website: afterasuici...

8. Three strikes offences December 2020 [xlsx, 114 KB]

   ...2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total 911 1,310 1,333 1,275 1,291 1,424 1,506 1,519 1,299 1,184 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Gender Female 75 110 105 103 92 127 127 154 136 101 8% 8% 8% 8% 7% 9% 8% 10% 10% 9% Male 835 1,199 1,225 1,172 1,198 1,296 1,379 1,363 1,161 1,082 92% 92% 92% 92% 93% 91% 92% 90% 89% 91% Unknown 1 1 3 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 <1% <1% <1% 0% <1% <1% 0% <1% <1% <1%...

9. Mercury NZ Limited [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...period applicable for Mercury is 50 working days from 28 April 2020.2 5 The parts of the Decision that Mercury is appealing are: 5.1 Policy 11; 5.2 Policy 12; 5.3 Policy 13; 5.4 Table 3.11-2; 5.5 Consequential Amendments: (a) Rule 4.2.10.1(n); (b) 4.3.3 Policy 1; and (c) 5.2.3 Policy 2. 6 Overall, Mercury is interested in issues that may affect its ability to operate, maintain, upgrade and develop its renewable electricity generation assets, particularly its present...

10. Stewart v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs on discontinuance of appeal) [2023] NZACC 108 [pdf, 153 KB]

    ...Submissions were then filed by the Corporation, including noting that Ms Koloni, by that point, was already in receipt of judgments of this Court identifying absence of jurisdiction. 1 Stewart v Accident Compensation Corporation [2022] NZACC 101. 3 (e) In February 2023, the matter was set down for hearing to occur on 11 May 2023. A Minute dated 24 February 2023 was issued. (f) In accordance with the Practice Guidelines, it was for the appellant to prepare the required bun...