Search Results

1. [2024] NZSSAA 01 (30 January 2024) [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...XXXX is summarised as follows: 14.1 As a starting point the text is to be considered in light of its purpose and context.4 14.2 The following accepted principles of statutory interpretation are also relevant: 4 Legislation Act 2019, s 10(1). 4 (a) When the matter directly impacts on a person’s rights and interests, as in XXXX’s case, a generous and fair approach should be taken.5 (b) In relation to benefit legislation, the Court has explicitly held that th...

2. Rendell v Attorney-General [2024] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...response to his request. The delay by the Police in making the document available to Mr Rendell raises an additional issue for the Tribunal to determine. ISSUES [10] To determine the claim, the Tribunal must consider the following issues: [10.1] Whether the Police were entitled to withhold the NIA transaction logs of times, dates and identification details of Police employees who accessed Mr Rendell’s personal information, under s 27(1)(c) of the Act on the basis that to release...

3. LCRO 70/2018 AR v NM (10 April 2019) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...unfair advantage of them”.32 27 Property (Relationships) Act 1976, s 42(3). 28 See JQ v QM LCRO 97/2011 (28 August 2012) at [23]. 29 EO and EP v VO LCRO 240/2010 (3 August 2011) at [7], [49] — rule 10.1 which requires that “[a] lawyer must treat other lawyers with respect and courtesy” was perhaps the relevant rule concerning the lawyer not responding to another lawyer’s correspondence. 30 GE Dal Pont Lawyers’ Professional Res...

4. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 WML rebuttal Robert Pryor [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...clear understanding of the landscape (and visual) values of the existing environment. I agree this is standard practice and note that this is in accordance with the NZILA’s Best Practice Note: Landscape Assessment and Sustainable Management 10.1 (2010). 7. In her opinion, in paragraph 14, she considers that the landscape description that underpins my landscape and visual effects assessment is deficient in that it does not address the following landscape matters which she cons...

5. Waikato and Waipā River Iwi.pdf [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...(ENV-2020- AKL-96); (o) DairyNZ Ltd v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-97); (p) Wairakei Pastoral Ltd v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-98); (q) Beef & Lamb NZ Ltd v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-99); (r) Auckland Waikato and Eastern Fish and Game Council v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-101); (s) Federated Farmers of NZ Inc v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL- 102); (t) Landcorp Farming Ltd v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL-147); (u) Pukekohe Vegetable Growers Assn v WRC (ENV-2020- AKL-148); and (v) Lochiel Farmlands Limited v WRC (ENV-2020-AKL- 1...

6. Tatere v Hauraki - Mangatainoka No 1BC No 2C No 1 (2021) 93 Tākitimu MB 135 (93 TKT 135) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...Hauraki retained Mr Meroiti for further assistance in relation to whakapapa and tikanga, research related to a BNZ mortgage, livestock reconciliation and research into the Waimarama lease. 9 36 Takitimu MB 43 (36 TKT 43). 10 44 Takitimu MB 46-101 (44 TKT 46-101). 93 Tākitimu MB 141 (d) Mr Hauraki identified debts that existed between the Ngawapurua Trust, the Tatere Partnership and Rua Roa Trust. In his report dated 20 May 2015, Mr Hauraki stated that the former t...

7. Land Transport (Drug Driving) Amendment Bill [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...the qualifying drugs for the oral fluid testing device to be set to test at. 10. Clause 20 of the Bill (proposed new ss 71A – 71F) sets out the procedure for the oral fluid testing scheme. Key features of the oral fluid testing scheme include: 10.1 a person may be required to undertake a first oral fluid test without cause, whether or not the person has already undergone an alcohol breath-screening test. However, they cannot be required to undertake an oral fluid test if they have...

8. Hill v Accident Compensation Corporation (Interest on weekly compensation) [2023] NZACC 216 [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...[7] In April 2005, Mr Hill again saw Dr Campbell, who noted “paraesthesia up to mid (R) hand and pain arm on extension of shoulder”. On 9 May 2005, consultation notes described: 1 Hill v Accident Compensation Corporation [2005] NZACC 101. An application for leave to appeal to the High Court was dismissed on 20 March 2006. 3 [Still complains of] paraesthesia R finger/thumb, weak grip, hand pain, weakness, numbness up arm too which he feels is due to 2002 neck accident...

9. [2024] NZREADT 16 TG v CAC 2204 & XW (5 June 2024) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...something that had not happened here. [8] A sale and purchase agreement for the motel was signed on 17 May 2022. [9] On 25 August 2022, the Civil Aviation Authority (the CAA) said in an email to the neighbour that there had been a breach of part 101 of the Civil Aviation Rules (the CAA rules). An educational advisory had been issued to the drone operator who extended his apologies. The CAA did not provide consent to such operators. Consent had to be obtained from the property o...

10. People found unfit to stand trial or not guilty by insanity December 2018 [xlsx, 85 KB]

    ...offences 1 0 2 0 1 3 1 2 0 4 2% 0% 2% 0% 1% 3% 1% 1% 0% 2% 15: Offences against justice procedures, government security and government operations 1 1 2 2 5 3 1 3 7 8 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 3% 1% 2% 4% 4% 16: Miscellaneous offences 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% Total 57 59 102 94 101 108 125 145 194 178 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 3.Unfit-gender ethnicity age Table 3: Number and percentage of people found unfit to stand trial, by gender, ethnicity and age...