Search Results

Search results for 110.

769 items matching your search terms

  1. DA v EB LCRO 7/2013 (26 August 2014) [pdf, 125 KB]

    ...refunding money to Ms EB without appreciating the implications of doing so.17 Amended Notice of Hearing [18] The Committee then issued an amended Notice of Hearing advising the parties that it would also investigate whether Ms DA had breached s 110 of the Act by receiving the $8,000 cheque from Ms EB into her personal account.18 Parties Further Submissions [19] Ms EB said that Ms DA had told her to make the bank cheque out to her, and repeated that she could not keep track...

  2. AR v ZE LCRO 83/2012 (2 April 2014) [pdf, 285 KB]

    ...deducted money from the proceeds of the sale of the ARs’ property, despite a clear direction from them that she was not to deduct fees from their settlement funds. Review Issue [16] The issue on review is whether Ms ZE or the firm breached s 110(1)(b) or (2)(b) of the Act by failing to hold, or ensure that the money was held, exclusively for the ARs, to be paid to the ARs or as the ARs directed. 4 Jurisdiction [17] The jurisdiction of a Legal Complaints Review Office...

  3. Graham - Parish of Komakorau Lot 240B2 B (2015) 110 Waikato Maniapoto MB 161 (110 WMN 161) [pdf, 215 KB]

    110 Waikato Maniapoto MB 161 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20130010252 UNDER Section 338 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an application for recommendation to set apart 2,662m 2 of PARISH OF KOMAKORAU LOT 240B 2 BLOCK as a Māori reservation for the purpose of an urupā MARIA LEEANN GRAHAM AND MANIA ORIWIA HOPE Applicants Hearing: 20 February 2014 (73 Waikato Maniapoto MB 77-107)...

  4. VX & VXZ v North Island Standards Committee LCRO 126 / 2012 (5 June 2013) [pdf, 103 KB]

    ...parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] This is an application for review of a determination by the Standards Committee in which it found that VXZ, the law firm operated by Ms VX, had breached the provisions of s 110(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act) and issued a wrongful certificate under s 112(2) of the Act. [2] This decision is of some importance in that it concerns an arrangement between VXZ and the law firm WAA whereby V...

  5. Swanson - Waotu South C No 6B (2014) 110 Waiariki MB 187 (110 WAR 187) [pdf, 235 KB]

    110 Waiariki MB 187 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20140001655 A20140009526 UNDER Section 135, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Waotu South C No 6B Block JUNE ROSALIE SWANSON AND ZENA ADRIENNE LOWTHER Applicants Hearing: 8 October 2014 (Heard at Rotorua) Appearances: Mr C Bidois, for the applicants Judgment: 22 December 2014 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C T COXHEAD...

  6. WA & WB v North Islands Standards Committee LCRO 127 / 2012 (5 June 2013) [pdf, 96 KB]

    ...identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] This is an application for review of a determination by the Standards Committee in which it found that Messrs WB and WA had breached the provisions of s 110(1)(b) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act). [2] In the same way as my decision in LCRO 126/2012, this decision is of some importance in that it concerns an arrangement between WAA and VXZ, whereby VXZ operated w...

  7. Albert v Paeroa - Omaio 39 (2014) 110 Waiariki MB 119 (110 WAR 119) [pdf, 131 KB]

    110 Waiariki MB 119 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIARIKI DISTRICT A20130001240 UNDER Section 242, of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Omaio 39 BETWEEN NICHOLAS MOTU ALBERT Applicant AND TE TUNU PAEROA Respondent Hearing: 1 April 2014 (Heard at Te Kaha) Judgment: 19 December 2014 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE CL FOX 110 Waiariki M...

  8. CAC 20006 v Stevenson [2013] NZREADT 74 [pdf, 28 KB]

    ...complained of by Mr Stevenson took place in 2011. Accordingly Mr Stevenson’s conduct falls to be considered under the penalty provisions of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. The Tribunal has available to it those penalties which are set out in sections 110 and 93. [4] The penalties which are relevant to the charges on which Mr Stevenson have been found guilty are: [a] An order cancelling Mr Stevenson’s licence (s 110(2)(b)); [b] An order suspending Mr Stevenson’s licence (s 1...

  9. XB & XC v A North Island Standards Committee LCRO 207-208 / 2012 (10 June 2013) [pdf, 163 KB]

    ...matter and conducted a hearing the Committee determined that there has been unsatisfactory conduct on the part of the practitioners pursuant to s152(2)(b) of the Act due to breaches of regulations 11(1) and (2) of the Trust Account Regulations, ss110(1)(a) and 110(1)(b) of the Act and ss112(1)(a) and 112(1)(c) of the Act. 23. In particular the Committee notes: a. The two journals meant that the trust account did not provide a record of the amount of trust money held for each client...

  10. [2015] NZEmpC 110 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 74 KB]

    SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 110 [13 July 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 110 ARC 22/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application (by leave) for recall of interlocutory judgment BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZE...