Search Results

1. Daunton v CAC 10065 & Morgan [2012] NZREADT 71 [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...building repairs, the appellant knew renovations had been carried out and further work had been intended. The appellant does not seem to have been misled by the licensee but one can understand that he would have expected the licensee, as a previous boarder at the property, to know much detail 14 about the house and any renovations, even though he seemed to live below the main part of the house. [59] In terms of the confusion and stresses which took place on the settlement da...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 253 Karmarkar v Auckland Council [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...unconsented and non-compliant with the Plan as well as the Building Act and the Building Code and these require the Council to take enforcement action. In his experience some properties can be quickly recognised as flatting situations or families with boarders and he said that the Council takes no enforcement action in these situations. [51] Mr Glazebrook offered his opinion, based on his inspection and his discussions with Mr Baby, that the entire property is being used as one sin...

3. [2021] NZREADT 06 - Silcock (22 January 2021) [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...work fast. At 9.20 am, Mr Watson advised Ms Silcock by text that he would be speaking with the prospective purchasers that morning. At 9.35 am, Ms Silcock sent Mr Watson a further text asking him not to discuss anything with, or in front of, her boarder. Mr Watson acknowledged this text at 9.51 am. [9] Ms Silcock did not hear further from Mr Watson before she switched her cellphone off. When she turned it on shortly after 6 pm, she found a message from Mr Watson asking if...

4. NZCVS Methodology Report Cycle 2 (2019) [pdf, 4.9 MB]

   ...(Theft of / unlawful takes/converts motor vehicle). If the vehicle was parked inside a private yard, the respondent was then asked if it was taken by someone who was allowed to be at the property (for example, a workman doing a job, or a visitor or a boarder or someone living at home). If yes, the incident was also coded to offence code 2. If the vehicle was taken by someone not allowed to be on the property (or the respondent didn’t know who took it), the incident was double-coded as of...

5. NZCVS Methodology Report Cycle 1 (2018) [pdf, 5 MB]

   ...(Theft of / unlawful takes/converts motor vehicle). If the vehicle was parked inside a private yard, the respondent was then asked if it was taken by someone who was allowed to be at the property (for example, a workman doing a job, or a visitor or a boarder or someone living at home). If yes, the incident was also coded to offence code 2. If the vehicle was taken by someone not allowed to be on the property (or the respondent didn’t know who took it), the incident was double- coded as of...

6. NZCVS 2023 Methodology Report (Cycle 6) [pdf, 4.3 MB]

   ...parent with child(ren) One person living with their son(s) and/or daughter(s) (natural, step, adopted or foster). One parent with child(ren) and other person(s) This household could include another person that is unrelated, such as a flatmate or boarder or could be related but not part of the immediate family unit, such as parent’s sibling/children’s aunt. Couple only Two persons who are either opposite-sex or same-sex spouses/civil union partners/partners. Couple with no child...

7. King v CAC 20004 & Findlay [2014] NZREADT 78 [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...million prior to the Christchurch earthquakes. It was put to him by Ms Nash that the property would never have been worth half that, which is why he considered the tenders as quite low. Mr King said that he had been able to rent the house or take in boarders on a profitable basis. [23] It seems that, after the Christchurch earthquakes, the appellant’s insurance company cancelled the insurance cover on the property and that, apparently, is a matter of separate litigation. It was p...

8. NZCVS Cycle 4 2020-21 Methodology Report [pdf, 5.1 MB]

   ...parent with child(ren) One person living with their son(s) and/or daughter(s) (natural, step, adopted or foster). One parent with child(ren) and other person(s) This household could include another person that is unrelated, such as a flatmate or boarder or could be related but not part of the immediate family unit, such as parent’s sibling/children’s aunt. Couple only Two persons who are either opposite-sex or same-sex spouses/civil union partners/partners. Couple with no child...

9. Cycle-5-Methodology-Report-V1.0-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 5 MB]

   Methodology Report Cycle 5 (2021/22) ISSN 2744-5798 Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully excl

10. Mullane v Attorney-General [2017] NZHRRT 40 [pdf, 417 KB]

    ...prescribed by s 319FA. That procedure imposes obligations on the agency, not on the Police. [43.4] The Education (Hostels) Regulations 2005. Regulation 61 requires that anyone who has regular access to a hostel or who has unsupervised contact with boarders must undergo a vigorous suitability check, including Police vetting. [43.5] The Health and Safety at Work (General Risk and Workplace Management) Regulations 2016. Regulations 49 to 52 create a duty to ensure all workers at limite...