85 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Ju
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 08 March 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environment Ju
...sets of priorities and specifically require the applicants to identify whether they utilise their priorities within that subset and whether they want them to carry over as part of the application process and so that would allow some kind of 10 reconciliation and sifting out of areas where they’re not being used, so only those where they’re being used and the applicants want them to carry over, then they would be carried over. Does that make sense? Q. Mmm. A. And so that’s...
...sets of priorities and specifically require the applicants to identify whether they utilise their priorities within that subset and whether they want them to carry over as part of the application process and so that would allow some kind of 10 reconciliation and sifting out of areas where they’re not being used, so only those where they’re being used and the applicants want them to carry over, then they would be carried over. Does that make sense? Q. Mmm. A. And so that’s...
...sets of priorities and specifically require the applicants to identify whether they utilise their priorities within that subset and whether they want them to carry over as part of the application process and so that would allow some kind of 10 reconciliation and sifting out of areas where they’re not being used, so only those where they’re being used and the applicants want them to carry over, then they would be carried over. Does that make sense? Q. Mmm. A. And so that’s...