17878 items matching your search terms
...of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for extension of time BETWEEN BRENDON RICHARD BOOTH Plaintiff AND BIG KAHUNA HOLDINGS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed on 9 and 10 April 2014 Appearances: T Oldfield, counsel for plaintiff J Golightly, coundel for defendant Judgment: 11 April 2014 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 3) OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] The defendant ha...
...On [2012] the Auckland Standards Committee (Standards Committee) issued two determinations declining to take any further action on complaints by the Applicant against two lawyers. One was the above Respondent. [2] On [2013] the Applicant filed an application for review of each of the determinations. [3] Counsel for the Respondent contends that the Standards Committee decision was made available to the Applicant via email on [2012] (that is, the same day that the decision...
...LEE Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: No appearance for the plaintiff S Kang, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 27 September 2024 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE J C HOLDEN [1] Yamaya NZ Limited filed a challenge against a determination of the Employment Relations Authority.1 Yamaya also applied for a stay of proceedings, effectively staying the execution of the Authority’s determination. The defendant, Suhee Lee, filed an appli...
...Home Address Occupation Respondent Full name Home Address Occupation Associated Respondent (if applicable) (Leave this section blank if it does not apply.) Full name Home Address Occupation COURT USE ONLY: Date document is filed: (Court stamp) PAGE 2Notice of DefenceV1 June 2019 This document is filed by: Name Address for service If filed by lawyers: Name of acting lawyer Contact number PAGE 3Notice of DefenceV1 June 2019 Respondent/Associa...
...I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 140 EMPC 343/2020 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for leave to file further evidence BETWEEN RIO NGAWAKA Plaintiff AND GLOBAL SECURITY SOLUTIONS LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: R Ngawaka, plaintiff in person R Johnson, agent for defendant...
...LBC Adviser DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: In person Complainant: In person Adviser: In person Date Issued: 5 February 2014 2 DECISION [1] The Registrar filed a Statement of Complaint. It identified the complaint was referred to the Tribunal in respect of two applications for residence visas filed on behalf of the complainant’s brother. [2] The Statement of Complaint explained that after f...
...Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN MURRAY BOYD Plaintiff AND HELEN BLANCHARD Defendant EMPC 109/2019 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN HELEN BLANCHARD Plaintiff AND MURRAY BOYD Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: M Hardy-Jones, counsel fo...
...appropriate to have struck out the plaintiff’s amended statement of claim because it failed to comply with the Employment Court Regulations 2000. To avoid prejudice to the plaintiff because of the inadequate pleadings, I gave him 14 days to file a statement of claim that complied with the Regulations. Instead the plaintiff filed a notice discontinuing his challenge to the determination of the Employment Relations Authority. In my interlocutory judgment, I found that the defenda...
...BRENDAN KELLERMAN v STONEWARE 91 LIMITED t/a SWITCHED ON GARDENER NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 81 [22 May 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2014] NZEmpC 81 WRC 27/13 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time AND IN THE MATTER of an application to file notice of opposition out of time BETWEEN BRENDAN KELLERMAN Applicant AND STONEWARE 91 LIMITED t/a SWITCHED ON GARDENER Respondent Hea...
...respondents’ challenge to appeal as out of time) ____________________________________________________________________ [1] In accordance with the Chairperson’s Minute of 21 November 2016, Mr O’Neill’s Notice of Appeal has been accepted for filing. [2] In a memorandum dated 22 November 2016, counsel for the second and third respondents challenged the Chairperson’s direction that the Notice of Appeal should be accepted for filing. [3] Decisions as to whether a Notic...