Search Results

1. Auckland Standards Committee v Rohde [2016] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...Infractions of drink-driving law, even at relatively low levels, are serious, as is the dangerous driving involved in the second incident. [18] Mr Rohde’s behaviour in attempting to evade the police by speeding off and then departing from his vehicle and refusing to disclose who had been driving must be seen as aggravating features in a disciplinary context. Arising from that, the lack of concern for the position in which he placed his employee and colleague, both at the time and...

2. LCRO 24/2017 HC v DASH (24 January 2020) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...2016. [17] In providing a summary of Das’s position, his counsel submitted that: (a) Mr HC had acted for multiple parties on the same (or interrelated) transactions, when the parties had divergent interests and there was clearly more than a negligible risk of him being unable to discharge his obligations to all parties; and (b) Mr HC had failed to obtain informed consent and failed to advise the parties to obtain independent legal advice; and 6 (c) it would have been appar...

3. LCRO 261/2016 TJ v DM and ZP (26 September 2019) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...retainer is at polar opposites. From the significant to the mundane, the parties’ accounts of what transpired are distinguished by the extent to which they diverge. [41] Some of the concerns identified by Ms TJ directly raise the spectre of negligence. [42] Negligence is a cause of action that is well-understood by traditional civil courts. Its ingredients include a duty of care, a breach of that duty, and a measurable loss that has been caused by the breach of duty. Findings...

4. Auckland Standards Committee v Banbrook [2014] NZLCDT 37 [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...practitioner in this matter relates to whether he is bound by the Summary of Facts in the Securities Act proceedings, to which he agreed, and upon which he was sentenced. In particular Mr Banbrook does not consider that he was guilty of “gross negligence” 1 Davidson v Auckland Standards Committee No. 3 [2013] NZHC 2315, Brown J. 2 Banbrook v R [2013] NZCA 525. 3 notwithstanding the remarks of the sentencing judge, His Hono...

5. All charges and convicted charges June 2019 [xlsx, 859 KB]

   ...offences 966 856 937 1,100 1,305 1,455 1,536 1,815 2,109 2,113 2,671 3,336 4,460 5,107 5,065 5,014 4,972 4,815 4,344 3,937 4,195 4,175 4,272 4,763 4,520 4,691 4,680 4,588 4,607 5,324 5,079 5,071 5,826 5,254 5,659 6,017 4,943 5,795 5,178 04: Dangerous or negligent acts endangering persons 16,817 19,785 20,138 21,647 22,335 23,163 25,233 24,852 24,339 23,920 22,315 22,499 20,183 19,123 20,932 21,659 19,751 18,682 19,559 17,501 17,015 17,016 17,699 18,480 19,034 19,664 21,218 21,827 20,750 19,623...

6. [2017] NZEnvC 012 Envirofume v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 7 MB]

   ...Management Association of New Zealand. Lance Dear of Bio Vapor (NZ) Limited provided a presentation on an alternative to methyl bromide (heat treatment) that is successfully used at Ports of Auckland for a number of imports, particularly used motor vehicles. The forestry and wood processing industdes presented in a number of locations and the Committee heard from: • New Zealand Forest Owners Association; • New Zealand Institute of Forestry; • Wood Processors Association of N...

7. People found unfit to stand trial or not guilty by insanity June 2019 [xlsx, 85 KB]

   ...offences 3 2 5 2 4 2 2 4 3 3 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% <1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 02: Acts intended to cause injury 63 51 99 93 90 94 98 203 169 157 34% 22% 34% 30% 29% 21% 28% 32% 31% 28% 03: Sexual assault and related offences 30 48 17 27 42 143 56 81 72 43 16% 21% 6% 9% 13% 32% 16% 13% 13% 8% 04: Dangerous or negligent acts endangering persons 1 6 4 4 5 6 11 11 16 13 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% 3% 2% 05: Abduction, harassment and other offences against the person 8 16 23 24 14 28 23 34 37 36 4% 7% 8% 8% 4% 6%...

8. People found unfit to stand trial or not guilty by insanity June 2020 [xlsx, 87 KB]

   ...offences 2 5 2 4 2 2 4 3 3 5 1% 2% 1% 1% <1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 02: Acts intended to cause injury 52 99 93 90 94 98 203 169 157 166 23% 34% 30% 29% 21% 28% 32% 31% 28% 35% 03: Sexual assault and related offences 48 17 27 42 143 56 81 72 43 37 21% 6% 9% 13% 32% 16% 13% 13% 8% 8% 04: Dangerous or negligent acts endangering persons 6 4 4 5 6 11 11 16 13 11 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 05: Abduction, harassment and other offences against the person 16 23 24 14 28 23 34 37 36 32 7% 8% 8% 4% 6% 7...

9. People found unfit to stand trial or not guilty by insanity June 2021 [xlsx, 87 KB]

   ...offences 5 2 4 2 2 4 3 3 6 2 2% 1% 1% <1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% <1% 02: Acts intended to cause injury 99 93 86 94 98 202 169 157 166 209 34% 30% 28% 21% 28% 32% 31% 28% 35% 28% 03: Sexual assault and related offences 17 27 42 140 56 80 72 43 37 38 6% 9% 14% 31% 16% 13% 13% 8% 8% 5% 04: Dangerous or negligent acts endangering persons 4 4 5 6 11 11 16 13 11 24 1% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 3% 05: Abduction, harassment and other offences against the person 23 24 14 28 23 34 37 36 32 65 8% 8% 5% 6%...

10. People found unfit to stand trial or not guilty by insanity December 2019 [xlsx, 87 KB]

    ...offences 2 5 3 1 5 0 4 4 3 2 1% 1% 1% <1% 2% 0% 1% 1% 1% <1% 02: Acts intended to cause injury 52 87 105 71 93 107 117 220 154 170 31% 26% 37% 25% 32% 21% 28% 34% 26% 34% 03: Sexual assault and related offences 30 34 25 35 30 155 68 94 51 40 18% 10% 9% 12% 10% 31% 16% 15% 9% 8% 04: Dangerous or negligent acts endangering persons 1 7 4 6 4 6 14 11 22 9 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 3% 2% 4% 2% 05: Abduction, harassment and other offences against the person 15 21 22 19 15 33 26 34 44 27 9% 6% 8% 7%...