Search Results

Search results for Negligence vehicle.

900 items matching your search terms

  1. Gray & Ors as Trustees of the John Gray Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 300 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 00027 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN JOHN RAYMOND GRAY, DEAN GRIMMOND and SANDRA MAY BARRY as Trustees of the John Gray Family Trust Claimants AND No First or Second Respondents AND STEPHEN BRIAN LAY Third Respondent AND JESSOP TOWNSEND LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Fifth Respondent AND ARCHITECTURAL WATERPROOFING LIMITED (in Liquidation) Si

  2. EL1 Ltd & Anor as Trustees of the Eurolife Trust v Lay [pdf, 290 KB]

    CLAIM NO: 00932 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN E L 1 LIMITED and M & H TRUSTEE SERVICES LIMITED as Trustees of the Eurolife Trust Claimants AND No First or Second Respondents AND STEPHEN BRIAN LAY Third Respondent AND JESSOP TOWNSEND LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL Fifth Respondent AND ARCHITECTURAL WATERPROOFING LIMITED (in Liquidation) Sixth Respond

  3. 2.-Tim-Watterson-Project-Design-compressed.pdf [pdf, 27 MB]

    Barristers and Solicitors Wellington Solicitors Acting: David Randal / Thaddeus Ryan / Frances Wedde Email: david.randal@buddlefindlay.com Tel 64-4-499 4242 Fax 64-4-499 4141 PO Box 2694 DX SP20201 Wellington 6140 IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-Ā-TARA ROHE ENV-2020-WLG-00014 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER OF a notice of motion under section 87G of the Act

  4. NZLS 19 Mar 2013 Giving Evidence [pdf, 281 KB]

    ...defence. However, witnesses may also be required in what are known as civil cases. These are cases between individuals or bodies rather than involving the police as in criminal cases. They can involve all sorts of issues such as suing someone for negligence or defamation, a dispute between neighbours, or breach of contract. Other civil cases may require you to give evidence in the Employment Court, Family Court, Environment Court, a Disputes Tribunal and so on. You may also be asked to...

  5. BORA Border Security Bill [pdf, 72 KB]

    ...does not infringe s 27(3). This conclusion is supported by the history of Crown liability in New Zealand and the many provisions which afford protection to officials acting in the course of their duties in good faith and, in some instances, without negligence. Enhanced powers to question and detain 35. The Bill contains a number of clauses concerning new detention and questioning powers that raise issues in terms of ss 22 (arbitrary detention) and 23(4) (right to of persons detained u...

  6. LCRO 73/2019 LM v NO (27 July 2020) [pdf, 224 KB]

    ...nub of this review application. Did Mr NO act for more than one client in a matter? [61] I begin by setting out r 6.1: Conflicting duties A lawyer must not act for more than 1 client on a matter in any circumstances where there is a more than negligible risk that the lawyer may be unable to discharge the obligations owed to 1 or more of the clients. [62] This rule is not difficult to understand. The interests of two different clients in one matter must almost exactly align before...

  7. Rec-Recap-2024-Q1-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 873 KB]

    Recommendations Recap A summary of coronial recommendations and comments made between 1 January and 31 March 2024 Office of the Chief Coroner | 2024 (1) i Coroners’ recommendations and comments Coroners perform essential functions within our society. They inquire into a range of unexpected deaths to establish the identity of the person who has died and the cause and circumstances of their death. While inquiring into a deat

  8. Fehling v South Westland Area School [2012] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 144 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2012] NZHRRT 15 Reference No. HRRT 040/2010 IN THE MATTER OF A CLAIM UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN FRIEDRICH JOACHIM FEHLING PLAINTIFF AND SOUTH WESTLAND AREA SCHOOL DEFENDANT AT HOKITIKA BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms J Grant MNZM, Member Ms S Scott, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr Fehling in person Ms AM Sloane, Principal of SWAS for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 7 May 2012

  9. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Hamilton [2012] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 120 KB]

    ...Hamilton CIV-2003- 419-854, 6 April 2004 (Paterson J, PJ Davies & L Whiu) at [83]. [73] It is to be borne in mind that s 85(4) provides that while it is not a defence to proceedings under s 82 that the interference was unintentional or without negligence on the part of the defendant, the Tribunal must take the conduct of the defendant into account in deciding what, if any, remedy to grant. On the facts there is no arguable case that the interference was unintentional or without negli...

  10. TH v CY LCRO 32/2014 (14 October 2016) [pdf, 94 KB]

    ...further action in respect of their conduct complaints against Mr CY. [2] There has been a regrettable delay in having this decision made available to the parties. I apologise to the parties for that delay. Background [3] Mr and Mrs TH, through the vehicle of a family trust, were the owners of a residential property in [Area]. [4] They placed the property on the market for sale. Mr CY acted for the purchasers. A LIM report was requisitioned by the purchasers. That report identif...