[2018] NZEmpC 77 Jones v Downer NZ Ltd [pdf, 482 KB]
...fault. His evidence was that throughout these events, while Downer was behaving unreasonably towards him, he remained level-headed and calm. That evidence can be contrasted with what was said by most of the witnesses called for Downer, who almost universally disagreed with him and the version of events he described. In this judgment, I have reached the conclusion that Mr Jones’ evidence, where it conflicted with evidence given for Downer, was not to be preferred. [11] Mr Jo...