Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Tee [2013] NZLCDT 12 [pdf, 50 KB]
...no evidence to support his position, despite directions to do so from the Tribunal. Mr Tee did file a “Brief of Evidence” which he claimed raised matters in his defence, but despite repeated requests from the Tribunal he failed to file an affidavit in support of his defence. The Tribunal has read Mr Tee’s Brief of Evidence, but gives it little weight. It is not sworn or affirmed, it is not complete, with none of its Appendices attached, and it contains allegations and stateme...