Search Results

1. [2020] NZEmpC 53 Adventure Playground Rotorua Ltd v Isaac [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...hearing would be in excess of $45,000 plus GST and that costs on a Category 2B basis would be in the vicinity of $26,000. Adventure Playground opposes Mr Isaac’s application. [4] This judgment resolves the applications of both parties. Affidavits have been provided [5] Mr Isaac filed an affidavit in opposition to the applications for stay. He also filed an affidavit in support of his application for security for costs. [6] In relation to the applications for stay Mr Isaa...

2. [2022] NZEnvC 139 Cossens v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 182 KB]

   ...fairly heard, the court must first put a hold on the QLDC’s notification of its variation to preserve the current situation, in effect, ensuring a level playing field for the applicant and s274 parties. [6] The application is supported by an affidavit of Dr Cossens.2 Should I hear from the respondent? [7] Dr Cossens sought that the interim order be made without notice. On the face of the application, it does not satisfy the grounds for an ex parte order despite the high degre...

3. [2021] NZEnvC 099 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated v Wongan Hills Limited [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...[2] Feroze Brailsford, a researcher for the Environmental Law Initiative, has filed an application requesting access to: 1 ... those documents put before the Court by the applicants to support the enforcement order made. \v'e do not seek affidavits filed by the respondent. District Court (Access to Court Documents) Rules 2017 [3] Rule 8(1) of the District Court (Access to Court Documents) Rules 2017 stipulates that eve1y person has the right to access the formal court record...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 123 Tararua District-Council v Capital All Signs Holdings Limited [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...as the Court directs; and 4.3 That the orders are to apply to personal representatives, successors and assignees of the Respondents to the same extent as the orders apply to them, under s 314(5) of the Act. The application was supported by an affidavit of Craig Morgan Lunn (the Regulatory Services Manager at the Council). [4] Before considering the merits of the application it is necessary for me to address some matters of process. I record that Mr Easton attended the hearing on...

5. Respond to a Separation Order

   ...Separation Order. There’s no fee. Note: When you print the forms it's important to print them single sided. Fill in the form:Notice of defence form – G12 If you want to tell the court why the Separation Order shouldn’t be made, you can also fill in an affidavit:General affidavit form You can also make sure the court has your address by including your address on the forms. You will only be sent other documents relating to the case if you have given the court a New Zealand address. File yo...

   Located in:

   1. Family >
   2. Separation & divorce >
   3. Separation agreements & Orders

6. [2015] NZEmpC 91 Burrowes v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...in summary advanced on the basis that a permanent order was necessary for reasons of security and safety due to the plaintiff’s past but also potential future involvement with a Police specialist unit. [4] The application was supported by an affidavit from the plaintiff in which he described the need for security for persons involved in the work of the unit, and referred to incidents where a breach of security could lead to significant concerns for an employee within the unit. H...

7. Auckland City Council (as assignee) v Russell [pdf, 30 KB]

   ...determination accordingly. 3.3 In a letter dated 9 November 2005 the Auckland City Council (through solicitors) asked that the Determination be for the sum of $70,000.00. There were submissions made in that letter. It was accompanied by an affidavit of Wayne Kenneth Nolan sworn 31 October 2005. 3.4 That material was supplied to Mr Russell who had, pursuant to Procedural Order No 9, 12 working days to reply. That time is now well and truly passed. I understand that the ca...

8. [2006] NZEmpC AC 74/06 Sandifer v Plumbers Gasfitters & Drainlayers Board NZ [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...whether the claim for costs was still being pursued in view of the plaintiff’s claim of impecuniosity. I advised the parties that if the matter of the plaintiff’s ability to pay was in dispute it might be necessary for the plaintiff to file an affidavit setting out his means. [16] On 3 October the defendant advised that it wished to pursue the application for costs and contested the plaintiff’s claim of impecuniosity. It claimed the plaintiff had undertaken investigation...

9. [2017] NZEmpC 65 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 13 KB]

   ...Appearances: P Lorigan, in person R Towner and S Maxfield, counsel for defendant Judgment: 24 May 2017 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] The plaintiff seeks leave to file notices of opposition and supporting affidavits in respect of an application for security for costs and an application for further particulars of his statement of claim. Leave is required because the original documentation presented for filing by the plaintiff was rejec...

10. [2015] NZEmpC 133 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 89 KB]

    ...IN THE MATTER of an application for leave by the defendant to file interlocutory application BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By affidavit and memorandum filed on 30 and 31 July 2015 Appearances: MW O'Brien and B Nicholson, counsel for plaintiff C Meechan QC and J Douglas, counsel for defendant Judgment: 3 August 2015 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT...