Auckland Standards Committee v Van der Zanden [2014] NZLCDT 54 [pdf, 78 KB]
...3. Are there mitigating factors present? 4. Is suspension a necessary penalty in all the circumstances? 1. Seriousness of Conduct? [3] The starting point is the seriousness of the conduct. In our decision we described the first misleading affidavit sworn by Mr van der Zanden as “sloppy” which was not explained by inexperience alone. We described the second affidavit as “utterly reckless of him”. [4] However we did not find that the conduct was either intentionally misl...