CK v Auckland Standards Committee LCRO 63 / 2011 (11 October 2013) [pdf, 130 KB]
...Practitioner (through CL) had submitted to the Standards Committee that he was bound by his client’s instructions and had a duty to put forward his client’s best case. He also noted that the prosecutor who appeared at the sentencing had sworn an affidavit that the sentencing indicator was [number] years, which accorded with his client’s recollection, even though it did not 8 Above n8. 8 conform to the Judge’s note in...