LCRO 236-2015 DZ v EY [pdf, 176 KB]
...Court. In the meantime, communications between J’s parents continued to deteriorate. [6] On Ms FX’s instructions, in November 2012, Ms EY applied for a protection order to prevent Mr DZ having contact with her, J and her daughter. Ms FX’s affidavit expresses her concern that she would be unprotected once the criminal allegations were resolved and Mr DZ was no longer the subject of bail conditions. [7] The evidence Ms FX had given in 2012 was tested by cross examination in...