Search Results

1. CH v Q Ltd [2021] NZDT 1617 (9 August 2021) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...

2. [2021] NZEnvC 063 SKP Incorporated v Auckland Council [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...thirty-two briefs of lay evidence was exchanged in the appeals. 16 Memorandum of appellant Ronald \v'alden in relation to costs, dated 3 August 2018. Memorandum of counsel for SKP Incorporated in reply to applications for costs, dated 3 August 2018. Affidavit of Kathryn Ngapo in opposition to application for costs, dated 2 August 2018. Reply memorandum of Thomas Greve for SI<P Inc Society Challenge to application far costs, dated 24 August 2018. 6 incurred by the parties wo...

3. Gwak & Kim TRI-2020-100-006 Procedural Order 5 [pdf, 223 KB]

   ...construction and the defects and damage occasioned to the claimants’ home and to respond to the claims against him. The assessors’ reports do not assist in that inquiry. No other party’s documents do either. [110] I have not overlooked that the affidavit of Stephen Hubbick for the third respondent identified and appended a number documents held by Auckland Council on its file. I have reviewed those documents. [111] My view on seriously prejudicial effect of the loss of Mr...

4. Wellington Standards Committee 2 v Collins [2022] NZLCDT 22 (30 June 2022) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...[49] Mrs M’s own evidence (which was not able to be tested because she declined to attend the hearing to answer questions from the Tribunal), suggested that Mrs W suffered anxiety attacks “when issues were raised” and went on to say in her affidavit “it was a bit awkward because it was obviously wrong to leave [Mrs W] in ignorance, but by the same token we were alarmed at how stressed she became when we did raise them, so we tried to achieve a balance covering the essential”...

5. [2010] NZEmpC 115 Fonterra Cooperative Group Limited v Te Stroet [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...laboratory technician position and do not affect his claim to reinstatement to another position no less advantageous to him. Indeed, Ms Beard concedes that the size of the enterprise means that Fonterra has regular vacancies and, as she says in her affidavit, “… any delay in reinstating Mr Te Stroet will not adversely affect his ability to secure a suitable alternative position with Fonterra.” [31] Next, and most strongly, Ms Beard says that if Mr Te Stroet is reinstated to a...

6. SE v VT, DJ and CM LCRO 163/2014 (11 March 2015) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...to take instructions on company matters, after providing advice on the two issues in 2002. [55] He advised that the Practitioners had not received any further instructions from the company, subsequent to those received in 2002. He has sworn an affidavit to that effect for the High Court. I am satisfied that [Law Firm L] took no instructions on behalf of the company, other than in respect to the two matters which were dealt with in 2002. [56] There is no evidence to support argumen...

7. Director of Human Rights Proceedings [NKR] v Accident Compensation Corporation (Strike-Out Application) [2014] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...always possible to publish decisions timeously. THE EVIDENCE [5] Before addressing the statutory provisions relevant to the jurisdiction challenge it is necessary to provide an overview of the uncontested evidence produced by ACC in the form of an affidavit by Ms M Henderson, Manager Government Services, ACC, Wellington whose responsibilities include signing correspondence to the Privacy Commissioner in relation to complaints under the Privacy Act. To a large degree the issues between...

8. LCRO 140/2021 TQ v RI (8 August 2022) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...proceeding, due to the fact that the plaintiffs were incorrect, but RI, [Law Firm A] was adamant that I was unable to do anything to oppose these court proceedings, – which is in fact untrue, as subsequently RI, [Law Firm A], has now admitted in his affidavit, that the plaintiffs were incorrect (see Exhibit B). Also, as I was preparing these court documents for today, I found the following information regarding this matter which states about an “interlocutory application” (see Exhi...

9. NM & B Ltd v J Ltd & RJ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1662 (9 August 2021) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...$200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determination...

10. M Ltd v KC [2023] NZDT 26 (2 February 2023) [pdf, 145 KB]

    ...filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavit, then serve it on the other parties. There is a fee for this application. District Court proceedings are more complex than Disputes Tribunal proceedings, and you may wish to seek legal advice. The District Court may, on determinat...