[2014] NZEmpC 213 Hixon v Campbell and Ors substantive [pdf, 264 KB]
...no formal step to defend them. That accounts for the delay in finalising the hearing of the case. [4] For the purpose of this judgment we assumed that the Labour Inspector would prove his allegations in the amended statement of claim and on the affidavit evidence filed, although this temporary assumption would not have precluded a later challenge to them by the defendants if the proceedings had survived. All references to events in the following narrative must be read accordingly....