Search Results

1. Te Rununga o Ngati Hine - Determination of dispute between Te Rununga o Ngati Hine and Te Rununga a Iwi o Ngapuhi (2011) 28 Taitokerau MB 217 (28 TTK 217) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...the Crown and her appearance primarily served to demonstrate that there are some within Ngati Hine who support TRAION’s approach. [16] The hearing proceeded on the basis of an application to strike out. That is, the evidence was as per the affidavits, there was no cross-examination, the Court 28 Taitokerau MB 222 heard submissions only and the facts pleaded were assumed to be true 2 . As I explained to Mr Doogan for TRONH, should I conclude that the Court has jurisdiction...

2. LCRO 103/2022 RP v DQ (25 September 2024) [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...Committee for seven years. 4. “Why the Standards Committee has failed to adequately consider, pay any regard to our submissions and ultimately report upon our position in its notice of determination dated 23 May 2022…” Ms RP refers to the affidavit provided by Ms TJ and other submissions made by her. 5. Why the Committee has failed to investigate the conduct of Ms CY. Ms RP also expresses dissatisfaction with the report of the costs assessor (Mr FG). 6. Ms RP com...

3. Waitangi Tribunal Te Aroha Maunga Settlement process report [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   T H E T E A R O H A M A U N G A S E T T L E M E N T P R O C E S S R E P O R T Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W A I T A N G I T R I B U N A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 4 W A I 6 6 3 T H E T E A R

4. Short v Stowers - Te Tumu Kaituna 14 Block [2020] Māori Appellate Court MB 141 (2020 APPEAL 141) [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...properly run postal ballot in favour of the list of expressions of opposition, given the obvious weaknesses in the value of that material as reliable evidence. [53] At the hearing of 13 May 2019, the appellants provided their own evidence, the affidavit of Murray Patchell, which considered and analysed the support and opposition for the trust’s applications as received by the Court and by the trust. Mr Patchell deposed that 149 submissions were received by the Court but 59 of tho...

5. Crosswell v Auckland City Council [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...proceedings having been joined as a second named third respondent. When Helen Heenen made an application to be removed from the proceedings, her then husband, the third respondent Grant Malone, assisted his wife to be removed and filed a sworn affidavit stating: “I was the builder of the property at 13a John Rymer Place, Kohimarama (the property). I confirm that my wife at the time Helen Heenen had no involvement in the design, planning or the construction of the property.�...

6. [2022] NZEnvC 086 Smith & Silk v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 6 MB]

   ...to people’s safety, wellbeing and property be avoided.4 [3] I have read and considered the consent memorandum of the parties dated 22 April 2022 which details the agreement reached between the parties to resolve the appeal. I have also read the affidavits of Messrs McArthur and Blair who have satisfied me that any risk to people’s safety, wellbeing and property resulting from locating the proposed dwelling on the site, subject to the agreed conditions is negligible and that for the...

7. Have your say on the family justice system [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Information Act • in deciding if, and how, to refer to your submission in any possible subsequent paper prepared by the Ministry. Court information Please do not share documents about any Family Court cases you’ve been involved in (such as affidavits) or any specific details about your case (such as case numbers). This will help protect the privacy of other people who were involved, such as your children and whānau. It will also make sure that your submission does not breach the...

8. ZA v YB LCRO 164/2013 Recusal (31 August 2016) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...sought to rely;3 [16] As Mr [ZA] had identified this file as of concern to him, a redacted version of his letter of 6 May was provided to Mr [YB] and he was invited to identify any issues he wished to raise arising from it. said he wished to file affidavit evidence in support, a synopsis of submissions and have his advocate appear at a hearing to argue the matter. Mr [ZA] observed the LCRO’s timetable appeared not to have provided for him to attend to those matters, apologised for...

9. LCRO 191/2019 UY v FB (26 November 2020) [pdf, 266 KB]

   ...Court [172] The extent to which information that should remain confidential to the Family Court has been disclosed in the course of the progressing of this complaint has been regrettable. [173] I make directions that the lawyer for child report, affidavits and memorandums in respect to proceedings FAM 2019-090-410 and FAM 2009-090-789 that have found their way to the LCRO file are to be removed from the file and shredded. Conclusion [174] I see no grounds which could persuade...

10. LCRO 174/2013 ZF v H BU and G BU [pdf, 252 KB]

    ...failed to administer Ms BU’s affairs properly Mr BS reported that he had interviewed Ms BU who confirmed the complaints insofar as they related to her. However, when interviewed by Mr BS, Ms BU “was unable to refute what was stated in Mr ZF’s affidavit.”13 The Committee accepted Mr BS’s recommendation that Mr ZF had satisfactorily answered the complaints by Ms BU. 5 & 6 Mr ZF failed to follow the instructions of contributors and respond to correspondence The St...