Search Results

1. Ali v Wang [2015] NZIACDT 2 (22 January 2015) [pdf, 256 KB]

   ...point where the professional relationship ended are not relevant to Mr Wang’s professional obligations. Mr Wang’s Response to the Statement of Complaint [11] Mr Wang responded to the Statement of Complaint by filing a Statement of Reply and affidavit in support. [12] He acknowledged there were difficulties in the Practice, including that Mr Martin was a former lawyer, struck off for dishonesty. [13] Mr Wang said he was a part-time employee in the Practice during the period from...

2. BMN v Stonewood Group Ltd [2024] NZHRRT 64 [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...[145.6] Stonewood is ordered to return BMN’s personal USB to him within 20 working days of the date of this decision. If the USB cannot be located, then Stonewood Group Ltd is to use all reasonable endeavours to locate it and is to serve on BMN an affidavit detailing its endeavours to locate the USB within 20 working days of this decision. 25 [145.7] A final order is made prohibiting publication of the name, address, occupation and any other identifying details of BMN....

3. [2018] NZEnvC 227 Taranaki Energy Watch Incorporated v South Taranaki District Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...Taranaki region totaling about 90 onshore production wells.'3 [17] In addition, we were told there are: 8 The petroleum production facilities being Rimu , Kupe, Maui, Kapuni Production Stations and Kapuni Gas Treatment Plant. 9 Sutherland, affidavit affirmed 21 September 2018. 10 Roberts, supplementary evidence 28 May 2018 at [2(a)(ii)]. 11 Appended to Wesney, supplementary evidence dated 16 March 2018 entitled Taranaki Regional Council (2013) , 'Future directions for the...

4. The Māori Trustee v Smith - Waipaoa 5A2 (2016) 62 Tairawhiti MB 122 (62 TRW 122) [pdf, 471 KB]

   ...Ngapakira freehold. The sublease was transferred to Digga-Bygum Ltd in 2004. One of the conditions of the sublease was a commitment to a development programme by which the estate would match dollar for dollar development expenditure by Brown Riggs. In affidavit evidence Bruce Smith claimed that proceeds from the sale of the capital stock were applied to meet the estate’s contribution towards the development programme. He also said in response to questions that some of the proceeds...

5. Wihelmus Hooft van Huijsduijnen v Woodley [2012] NZWHT Auckland 11 [pdf, 451 KB]

   ...to building code compliance in the agreement for sale and purchase. Both claims were denied. 48 [165] The Woodleys instructed counsel at the commencement of the process but then chose to represent themselves. Mr Woodley provided an affidavit. Mr Woodley did not attend the complete hearing for health reasons but gave evidence by telephone conference by way of cross examination on his affidavit. Mrs Woodley took no part in the hearing process. [166] In their response th...

6. [2022] NZEnvC 6 Otago Regional Council - Primary Sector Provisions (Rural) [pdf, 3.3 MB]

   ...during the hearing and directed ORC to consult with the parties to the Part B effluent provisions’ mediation agreement regarding proposed amendments to Policy 7.D.6. In view of the need to consult, the Council elected to have Ms Boyd prepare an affidavit explaining in further detail the changes to the proposed policy.16 Proposed changes to Policy 7.D.7 [21] During the hearing, the court raised two queries in relation to the alignment between the policy and other provisions in t...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 129 Second Star Limited v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 591 KB]

   ...m) The totality of development proposed [by] Second Star, together with related activities, would cumulatively undermine Council’s strategy to protect the integrity of its rural areas within ONLs. The evidence for the Council [235] In her affidavit, Ms Blight summarised the planning framework for consideration of what she described as the contentious parts of the application relating to landscape and visual effects of the proposal. She referred to the Panel’s decision and em...

8. Miller-Hard v Stewart [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...and to ask questions of all the witnesses. Evidence was given under oath of affirmation by the following: • Greg Miller-Hard, called by the Claimant; • Kerry Murphy, a building consultant, called by the Claimant; • Grant Honeyfield (affidavit admitted by consent), for the Claimant; • Nicole Miller-Hard; • Geoffrey Morrison, a carpenter involved on the original building, called by myself; Claim No 00765 – Miller-Hard

9. [2022] NZEnvC 016 Federated Farmers of New Zealand v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...future was no longer planned by the Council, the Minister could not support the Court's interim definition as it said it might have done on the understanding that mapping was shortly to occur.12 The Minster's memorandum, supported by an affidavit from Dr \Vest, reiterated the considerable variability of spawning locations due to the interaction of river flow / discharge rate, the size of the spring tide and the interaction between the two. Spawning could occur 100 metres o...

10. Turner v University of Otago [2021] NZHRRT 18 [pdf, 443 KB]

    ...Court Rules 2016, Part 8, there is no counterpart obligation under the PA 1993 to identify documents which cannot be found or to specify what they contained. [97.2] Similarly, the obligation to list documents for which privilege is claimed (see the affidavit of documents in Form G37 in the High Court Rules) is not carried over into the PA 1993 regime. GENERAL POINTS ABOUT THE TWELVE REQUESTS [98] The 12 “requests” pleaded in the ASoC are problematical for at least three reasons:...