Search Results

1. Professor Simon Francis Thrush - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 2.7 MB]

   ...studying this and other types of natural and human-induced disturbance, as well as the ecological and environmental processes associated with ecological recovery from disturbance. 4 I was recently approached by Motiti Rohe Moana Trust to produce an affidavit prepared by me in relation to High Court proceedings, and an article that I co-authored in relation to Fishing Impacts and the degradation or loss of habitat structure. I am in Antartica between mid-October and mid- November 201...

2. Waitangi Tribunal - District 13 Part 2 Northern South Island [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...promised to act on behalf of the others and to include their names in the list of owners presented to the court. Atiraira’s solicitors outlined their case in a letter of 9 September 1904, to which Huria’s solicitors replied on 26 June 1905, with affidavits from Alexander Mackay and his cousin, James Mackay. These affidavits were used not merely to combat the application for an Order in Council, but were also used as evidence against later petitions. Atiraira’s lawyers argued that Alexande...

3. Dotcom v Crown Law Office [2018] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 944 KB]

   ...stated the documents were to be treated as evidence in the proceeding and did not need to be put to or admitted through a witness. The parties further agreed that material referred to in the common bundle but not included (such as exhibits to affidavits) could be treated as evidence if and only if that material was either put to a witness or referred to in opening submissions by either party. Other material not in the common bundle could be introduced as evidence in the normal way...

4. Human Rights Act 1993

   ...NZHRRT 49 Boyce v Westpac New Zealand Ltd (Non-Party Discovery) [2015] NZHRRT 31 Waters v Alpine Energy Ltd (Discovery) [2014] NZHRRT 8 Discovery – legal professional privilege – whether possible to go behind claim to privilege made by solicitor in affidavit of documents – High Court Rules, r 8.25 – Evidence Act 2006, ss 53, 54 and 56 Guo v PwC (Further Discovery) [2022] NZHRRT 6 Discovery – rationale for Matsuoka v E Tū Incorporated (Preservation Orders) [2018] NZHRRT 49 Discov...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Human rights >
   3. Decisions - Index

5. Strengthening the family justice system - PDF version [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...tell us if you don’t want all or specific parts of your submission released, and the reasons why. Court information and information about third parties Please don’t share documents about Family Court cases you’ve been involved in (such as affidavits) or any specific details about your case (such as case numbers). This will help protect the privacy of other people who were involved, such as your children and whānau. It will also make sure your submission does not breach the pr...

6. River Oaks Farm Ltd & Ors as Trustees of Ingodwe Trust v Olsson [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...APPENDIX 1 Listed below are the statements and documents that have become part of the proceedings: (i) Assessor’s Report, DBH, 26/01/2006; (ii) Assessor’s Addendum report, DBH, 03/09/2007; (iii) Procedural Orders No’s 1 – 7 including affidavits filed in relation to these procedural orders; (iv) Leaks List, WHT, 02/03/2009 Claimant Documents (i) The House Warrant of Fitness Company Report, March 2007; (ii) Estimate of Form Building & Developments, 18/12/2...

7. Taylor v Corrections [2018] NZHRRT 35 [pdf, 308 KB]

   ...effect of making the substantive content of the documents unintelligible. The personal information has been disclosed in full and without redaction. [127] As conceded by Corrections, one error has been identified. The name of the deponent of the affidavit at p 49 of Volume 1: Redacted Documents (open) is part of the personal information described in that email and ought not to have been redacted. However, as Corrections submitted the redaction is trivial and of no effect. Mr Taylor k...

8. Saffioti & Anor v Ward & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 17 [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...applying those standard awards, to reflect the particular circumstances and grounds upon which general damages are sought. [34] The only evidence provided to support the application for general damages is some brief comments in Mr Saffioti’s affidavit. In particular he 3 North Shore City Council v Body Corporate 188529 (Sunset Terraces) [2010] NZCA 64, [2010] NZLR 486 (CA), O’Hagan v Body Corporate 189855 (Byron...

9. [2019] NZSSAA 05 (31 January 2019) [pdf, 529 KB]

   ...oral hearing and this decision). c) If necessary, the Authority will hold a telephone conference before issuing orders. [62] It appears that the Ministry has consistently refused to meet with the appellant outside of a courtroom, it may file an affidavit relating to that matter if it wishes to do so. Dated at Wellington this 31 day of January 2019 G Pearson Chairperson K Williams Member C Joe JP Member 1 [2018] NZSSAA 22 Reference No. SSAA...

10. Andrew Michael Collins - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 1.4 MB]

    ...of functions "to control the taking, a/location or enhancement of fisheries resources for the purpose of managing fishing or fisheries resources contra/led under the Fisheries Act 1996." Attachment 1 to Mr Lawrence's evidence is an affidavit of his dated 16 August 2016 in relation to an application to the Environment Court for strike out and declaration. 14 1115 7 .12 The proposed rules do appear to have enforcement implications that are not reflected in Mr Lawrence1...