Samuel v Samuel - Succession to Te Urupiki Samuel (2025) 334 Waiariki MB 271 (334 WAR 271) [pdf, 266 KB]
...are nephews, and have been permitted, according to Reihana, to remain within the whānau out of a sense of hūmārie. [43] It strikes me that there is nothing hūmārie about the stance taken by Reihana during the hearing. In Reihana’s initial affidavit of 2016, he was clear that his sister Te Urupiki had “whāngai’d” the boys and that they were whāngai. However, by the time of the hearing, his position had changed to rejecting the assertion that Delarey and Rangiteaorere w...