Search Results

1. About the Tribunal

   ...Community. Bronwen Klippel Bronwen Klippel practised as a lawyer in Auckland for more than 30 years, working mainly in the areas of family law, health professional disciplinary work and mediation and was appointed as a part-time member of the Refugee Status Appeals Authority in 2003. Ms Klippel has undertaken community work and voluntary positions including sitting on two school trust boards, mentoring secondary school students, advising Womens' Refuges and Citizen Advice Bureaus, and having ex...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Human rights

2. [2020] NZREADT 08 - Bond (25 February 2020) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...to pay a fine of $750. Payment is to be made to the Authority within 20 working days of the date of this decision. [33] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out the right of appeal to the High Court. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. ________________ Hon P J Andrews Chairperson ________________ Ms C Sandelin Member ___________...

3. MLC 2018 April Outstanding OCR Applications [pdf, 377 KB]

   ...164-165 and 90 Aotea 81-82 dated 30 April 1999 and 11 December 1998 - Application to Chief Judge A20180001430 58/93 Lawrence Niao Matata Parish Lot 39A 2A - and charging orders made at 176 Waiariki 226-243 on 30 November 2017 - Notice of Appeal A20180001438 58/93 Rae Beverly Adlam Matata Parish 39A 2A - and a charging order made at 176 Waiariki MB 226 on 30 November 2017 - Notice of Appeal A20180001563 45/93 Lindsay Katene Thomas Phillip Meads also known as Kereru...

4. AS v DV LCRO 14/2014 (5 August 2014) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...[24]. 3 Above n 2 at [28]. 4 Above n 2 at [30]. 5 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 at Rule 10.7. 3 investigator, and seek and receive evidence. The statutory power of review is much broader than an appeal, and gives the LCRO discretion as to the approach to be taken on any particular review, and the extent of the investigations necessary to conduct that review. Review Hearing [14] On 29 July 2014 Mr AS and Mr DV attended a revie...

5. BORA Building Amendment Bill [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...these general safeguards, there are safeguards applicable specifically to new ss 133BT and 207M which help to ensure that they impair the right to freedom of expression no more than is reasonably necessary. In particular, new s 133BT is subject to an appeals process and new s 207N places limits on the chief executive’s ability to share evidence or information collected in the investigation of a building failure, including information that owners have been required to provide under new s...

6. [2024] NZEmpC 69 Magnum Hire Ltd v Parker [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...important was whether Mr Parker was prevented from making a breach of contract claim by s 113 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 and thus whether the awards of special damages made by the 18 Although dealing with an application to bring an appeal out of time, the Supreme Court made helpful observations about the necessarily superficial nature of any consideration of the merits of cases at an interlocutory stage in Almond v Read [2017] NZSC 80, [2017] 1 NZLR 801 at [39]....

7. GB v PW LCRO 140/2012 (13 August 2014) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...much 1 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008. 2 Above n1. 3 Affidavit of Ms GB sworn 2 July 2012 at [22]. 4 Above n 3 at [7]. 3 broader than an appeal, and gives the LCRO discretion as to the approach to be taken on any particular review and the extent of the investigations necessary to conduct that review. Review Hearing [11] The parties attended a review hearing in Auckland on 2...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 245 Bracewell v Richmond Services Ltd [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...destruction or non-alteration as she fears. The defendant’s preparedness to agree to a stay on that condition has been consistently held out to the plaintiff but rejected by her. [22] Although the law on stays of execution of remedies pending appeals has from time to time set out a number of tests to be applied, the overall consideration is where the interests of justice lie until the Court can finally determine the proceeding. [23] I am satisfied that the interests of justice in...

9. AX v ZM LCRO 244/2012 (23 April 2014) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...has broad powers to conduct her own investigations, including the power to exercise for that purpose all the powers of a Standards Committee or an investigator, and seek and receive evidence. The statutory power of review is much broader than an appeal, and gives the LCRO discretion as to the approach to be taken on any particular review and the extent of the investigations necessary to conduct that review. Discussion [31] At the review hearing Ms AX traversed a wide range of...

10. KB and SB v EQC [2020] CEIT-2020-0021 [pdf, 222 KB]

    ...refer to both protections as being without prejudice. Although I am not bound by the requirements of the Evidence Act, the without prejudice rule is a very important one. In Sheppard Industries Ltd v Specialized Bicycle Components Inc the Court of Appeal discussed the exceptions when evidence of without prejudice communications may be admissible.3 Of these exceptions, three require consideration: (a) when parties have mutually waived the protection of the without prejudice rule;...