Search Results

1. August 2015 National Pānui [pdf, 307 KB]

   ...Court, Hauora House, Haupapa Street, Rotorua Tuesday 11 August 2015 Judge P J Savage, Judge D J Ambler, Judge S R Clark Applications for Hearing PANUI NO: TIME: APPLICATION NO: SECTION: APPLICANT: SUBJECT: 1 10:00AM A20150002453 58/93 Edward Matchitt Appeal 2015/10 - Te Kaha 65 Block - and a decision of the Court made at 104 Waiäriki MB 145-151 on 16 September 2014 - Appeal At Rotorua | Mäori Land Court, Hauora House, Haupapa Street, Rotorua Wednesday 12 August 2015 Judge P J Savage...

2. [2014] NZEmpC 231 Premier Events Group Ltd and Anor v Beattie and Ors [pdf, 685 KB]

   ...not to engage in another similar business within a certain proximity and for a period of two years after the termination of his employment. [187] The issue of repudiation and continuing obligations was again considered by the English Court of Appeal in Cantor Fitzgerald International v Callaghan 14 in which the remuneration package of several employees included a loan to be forgiven after four years of employment. Subsequently, uncertainties about tax liabilities arose and the...

3. 0724622 Ministry of Justice National Panui September 2022 [pdf, 541 KB]

   ...Judge's MB 51-59 on 8 February 2012 - Application to the Chief Judge A20210008483 58/93 Rachel Witana Omapere Taraire E & Rangihamama X3A Ahu Whenua Trust and an order varying a trust at 229 Taitokerau MB 133-160 (19 April 2021) - Notice of Appeal A20210008798 45/93 Josephine Wade CJ 2021/28 - Dean Wade - and a succession order made at 77 Taitokerau MB 16-23 dated 24 March 2014 - Application to the Chief Judge APPLICATIONS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF REGISTRAR continued...

4. Waitangi Tribunal - Part II Te Urewera [pdf, 6.9 MB]

   T    E  U     R  E  W  E  R  A P   A  R  T     I  I,  V    O    L    U    M    E  1 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz W  A  I�

5. Heng v Walshaw [pdf, 550 KB]

   ...decision, WHRS Adjudicators had regularly awarded general damages, where appropriate, for stress, anxiety, and inconvenience in relation to leaky building claims brought under the Act in reliance on the District Court decision of Judge McElrea on appeal from a determination of an Adjudicator under the Act, in Waitakere City Council v Sean Smith (Unrep. CIV 2004-090-1757, Auckland District Court, 28 January 2005). The Council appealed the determination on the grounds, inter alia, t...

6. Human Rights Act 1993

   ...Act 1993, ss 104(5) and 108(3) – Human Rights Review Tribunal Regulations 2002, reg 16(1) Guo v Culpan (Agent) [2017] NZHRRT 57 Apparent bias – recusal – test for Deliu v New Zealand Law Society (Second Recusal Application) [2013] NZHRRT 12 Appeal – stay of decision – whether Tribunal has jurisdiction to order stay – principles to be applied – Human Rights Act 1993, s 123(9) Waters v Alpine Energy Ltd (Stay) [2014] NZHRRT 19 Authorised or required by an enactment or otherwis...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Human rights >
   3. Decisions - Index

7. Vivash v Accident Compensation Corporation [2020] NZHRRT 16 [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...obligation to determine delayed incapacity was that of the case manager at the time. Because the file had been 12 destroyed there was no evidence the issue had ever been addressed or that Mr Vivash had been made aware of the decision and of his appeal rights. [44] It is clear from the medical evidence reviewed earlier in this decision that the 1982 and 1985 accidents have in fact led to progressive degeneration. This underlines the point that a retention policy which hinges on t...

8. ENV-2016-WLG-000058 Notice of Motion [pdf, 4.8 MB]

   ...Application; (ii) The technical nature of the Application and the resource consents required; (iii) Direct referral will enable the efficient determination of the issues; (iv) Will reduce the duplication of process as there is a real likelihood of appeals; (v) Direct referral is consistent with the purpose of the 2009 amendments to the RMA, intended to streamline resource consent processing and reduce costs, delays and uncertainties for all parties; (g) There is no prejudice to any...

9. [2014] NZEmpC 111 Bracewell v Richmond Services Ltd [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...obligations of probity and integrity over the use of public resources. 6 These recommendations were accepted and the statute was duly enacted in 2000. [15] A convenient overview of the statute is provided in the following statement of the Court of Appeal in Reeves v One World Challenge LLC: 7 The Protected Disclosures Act provides that if whistleblowers want to breach confidentiality agreements to expose wrongdoing they must do so via the regime provided for in the Act; onl...

10. [2010] NZEmpC 4 Lewis v Howick College Board of Trustees [pdf, 156 KB]

    ...impracticability before the Court can refuse an order of reinstatement claimed by an unjustifiably dismissed employee. [113] The important element of practicability has long attached to the remedy of reinstatement. It was first considered by the Court of Appeal in New Zealand Educational Institute v Board of Trustees of Auckland Normal Intermediate School2. The Court confirmed the decision of the Labour Court that reinstatement of an unjustifiably dismissed deputy principal of a s...